• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

A2A B-377 flight!

When I first got this bird with Accu-sim, I burned up a lot corn on the cob (R4360). :biggrin-new: Since then was hangar. Really didn't take the time to understand how Accu-sim works with 4 engines, but brought it back out for a flight and actually made a circuit. :adoration:
 
I have this brilliant DVD simply called 'Connie' , the restoration off the HARS Lockheed Constellation, once they got it going, it really showed how busy the engineer really got, the constant monitoring - writing down details and simply keeping it in the running order - A2A really did a wizard job on this one :adoration: Ted, a brilliant vid to introduce others to it .
 
I have logged a ton of hours in the A2A B-377 as pilot and engineer...WOW what's not to like? Scott and team show off their genius in all their models! Great video Amigo
Ted
 
Great video! I was just thinking of the 377, as I just got a new book on it. Now I'm going to have to take it out for a spin. Maybe some of the Northwest flights down the west coast.

I've never thought of flying from the engineer perspective.

Jim
 
Was this the aeroplane Ernest K Gann referred to as a 'technical monstrosity, requiring four or five people to make it work'?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top