RAF urged to cut new jets for cheap propeller aircraft

C

CWOJackson

Charter Member
tucano_385x185_675669a.jpg


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/afghanistan/article6997720.ece
 
'Cold war jets'...the Typhoon ?! The actual predecessor (EAP) of the Typhoon made it's first flight back in the 1980s, but calling it a real Cold War jet :rolleyes:...it barely took over the UK's QRA role...

I agree though that for wars like Afghanistan aircraft like a AT-6B or (Super) Tucano, are better suited than a Typhoon. The best one for such wars is the Thunderbolt (A-10, which are currently being upgraded to A-10C IIRC) in my opinion. Or a Harrier...along with some Chinooks and AH-64D's.

The advantage pure jets enjoy is the pure speed which may be needed if something has to be done urgently and IFR/AAR - the aircraft can stay around as long as the crew is still capable of flying the machine and as long as it still has some sort of offensive capability (a cannon, simple unguided rockets or bombs, AGM's,...).

I believe the US uses F-15Es for shows of force against the Taliban etc, no ?
Something like Tucano does the job for irregular warfare [of the future] and is effective and cost-efficient.
Click to expand...
 
might as well just scrap the whole thing and whilst there at it, get rid of the army, navy, tax the broadband at more than the 6 quid their gonna to. That should save them enough money to buy themselfs a new sodding buck pond! :monkies:
 
JorisVandenBerghe said:
'Cold war jets'...the Typhoon ?! The actual predecessor (EAP) of the Typhoon made it's first flight back in the 1980s, but calling it a real Cold War jet :rolleyes:...it barely took over the UK's QRA role...

I agree though that for wars like Afghanistan aircraft like a AT-6B or (Super) Tucano, are better suited than a Typhoon. The best one for such wars is the Thunderbolt (A-10, which are currently being upgraded to A-10C IIRC) in my opinion. Or a Harrier...along with some Chinooks and AH-64D's.

The advantage pure jets enjoy is the pure speed which may be needed if something has to be done urgently and IFR/AAR - the aircraft can stay around as long as the crew is still capable of flying the machine and as long as it still has some sort of offensive capability (a cannon, simple unguided rockets or bombs, AGM's,...).

I believe the US uses F-15Es for shows of force against the Taliban etc, no ?
Click to expand...

The Typhoon's (EAP) design phase harks back to the early 80's (maybe before?)......and yep....the Cold War was still in full swing then. In fact we came very very close to WWIII on a number of occasions during the 80's.
Typhoon was never designed for operations in combat theatres such as Iraq and Afghanistan. It's primary role was as an interceptor tasked with downing as many inbound bombers as possible that would be coming from the former WarPac countries.
The Harrier is more suited to the CAS/COIN role although it's extremely expensive to operate...and rather unreliable (at least in it's earlier marques). Unfortunately the RAF's funds are at an all time low and while aircraft such as Super Tucano, PC-9, etc are more suited to today's combat roles ......what's to say that the goal posts will not shift in the near future?
 
stiz said:
tax the broadband at more than the 6 quid their gonna to. That should save them enough money to buy themselfs a new sodding buck pond! :monkies:
Click to expand...
but they would have to buy broadband detector vans:applause:
then
H
 
Oh dear... Look at Russia. Look at the way Putin (the Prime Minister!!) is posturing and sabre-rattling. We are still in a sort of cold war, I'm afraid. Admittedly the ex-Sovs are a bit under-par compared to the good old days, but they've learnt some solid lessons in Chechenya and are improving the quality of their armed forces quite successfully, I understand. So let's put all our cash in Tucanos and other Co-in stuff, scrap the Typhoon, cancel our subs and carrier(s), and sell all our Challengers, Warriors and light armour to the Gulf States. Brilliant. Nothing is more likely to encourage the ex-Sovs to get stroppy than total weakness on our part. It's bad enough as it is. I remember when the Argies invaded the Falklands, we had to hand over our choppers, 66s and Carl Gustavs, night-sights, Lannies, grenades, most of our GPMGs and half our SLRs even - and nearly all our ammo - to the Task Force. The Sovs must have been pissing themselves... Or at least, pissing themselves almost as much as when we were trying to be mechanised Infantry in Osnabruck with 432s that couldn't even run for one day without all breaking down. It was pathetic! But there were more of us then. Now, they still have the guts and the training, but they are so few... And always with the wrong kit for the war in hand. We need Typhoons, if only so we don't have to use them...
 
While the design may be of 1985 and it's original requirement by the RAF dates from as early as 1971, in my opinion it's not a Cold War jet.

The actual first flight of a real Eurofighter (the prototype) was in 1994 - I was three years old at the time.

Consequently, calling it a Cold War jet seems the same to me as calling the 'Spad' (the Skyraider, not the WWI SPAD) a WWII fighter bomber, since it was designed in 1944...in my humble opinion.

But I'm just a post-Cold War nearly 19-year old...others may have a different view on this :rolleyes:.

Perhaps they could use some still flying T-28's and Skyraiders in Afghanistan :engel016:.

And I hate to see defence budget cuts...
 
having been in Afghanistan i want A-10's :icon_lol::icon_lol: nothing scares he with sandals, a herd of goats and a cigarette hangin out his mouth more than a 'hog overhead :icon_lol: see helicopters are still crucial out there, need ones that can deal with sand AND altitude, they sent Lynx's originally, not very good out there... and limited combat load, more nooks ooh yes please :icon_lol:

back on track, i remember watching Farnbrough '97 on TV, with Eurofighter 2000 as it was then (wasn't even called Typhoon) fly set to Robert miles - 'Children' song... good days, and we need the jets, i personally wouldn't want to be in a tucano when johnny-rag head decides it's a special occasion and digs out a MANPADS :kilroy:
 
leaopard is a can opener, Challenger is a can KILLER :icon_lol: Typhoon has 1 advantage a tucano doesn't.... Towed Decoy, oh and speed :icon_lol:
 
Smoothie said:
leaopard is a can opener, Challenger is a can KILLER :icon_lol:
Click to expand...

Right, right...

The Challenger Lethality Improvement Programme is a programme to replace the current L30A1 rifled gun with the 120 mm Rheinmetall L55 smoothbore gun currently used in the Leopard 2A6.
Click to expand...

:icon_lol:


Typhoon has 1 advantage a tucano doesn't.... Towed Decoy, oh and speed :icon_lol:
Click to expand...

I don't think a MANPAD cares whether the target is fast or not. ;)
 
scrap the lot and hire a small band of tiny people
(see 'J. R. R. Tolkien' Lord of the rings)









..sorry cheesy couldnt resist :kilroy:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top