Tomorrows Fighter Here Today!!!, Enjoy! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4i9kQ9MFkI&feature=related :salute::salute::salute:
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.
Why is it "Fail"..:ques:
The really is no need for me to quote Smoothie and OBIO post.
So in other words, you don't know what the original USAF requirement was.....
Bone,
I was NOT the one who called it a "fail".![]()
If the F-20 Tigershark didn't whip up any interest, then I'm pretty sure this tweaked up Eagle isn't go to be a hit either. Even though I think cheap and very capable is a great idea in a fighter jet, the organizations that do the buying never go for it when it's based on an old design...and in this case it's a forty year old design. Not gonna happen.
If the F-20 Tigershark didn't whip up any interest, then I'm pretty sure this tweaked up Eagle isn't go to be a hit either. Even though I think cheap and very capable is a great idea in a fighter jet, the organizations that do the buying never go for it when it's based on an old design...and in this case it's a forty year old design. Not gonna happen.
Yes gentleman, I am aware of the history that you both stated. Just because the F-22 isn't available doesn't neccesarily dictate a scramble to acquire the souped up Eagle.