As I mentionned, I do agree for the VC, much crispier. And the sound gives also a more realistic impression (but I had already modified my own V2 soundpack, so I can't perfectly evaluate the difference...)
For the way the plane sits, it is certain that the undercarriage of V2 is too high, but don't forget that, for the comparison of the silhouettes, I put all the three planes on the same axis of reference on each image.
For the pleasure of flying, I must admit to be disturbed by the NG fluctuating with the RPM axis, and by the tanks... I have 60 min of fuel just after take off, and that's very short, but understandable while round 200 kg of fuel are missing... So, maybe this bugs distorts my judgement, but I'm also disturbed by the way the plane lose energy (did you attempt a looping ? What do you think ?), and, while I thought that V2 was too fast, I think it's too difficult to reach even 300 knts with V3... It's certain that I need training, but I'm not so sure it will change these characteristics, particularly with an airplane lighter than the real one...
For the way the plane sits, it is certain that the undercarriage of V2 is too high, but don't forget that, for the comparison of the silhouettes, I put all the three planes on the same axis of reference on each image.
For the pleasure of flying, I must admit to be disturbed by the NG fluctuating with the RPM axis, and by the tanks... I have 60 min of fuel just after take off, and that's very short, but understandable while round 200 kg of fuel are missing... So, maybe this bugs distorts my judgement, but I'm also disturbed by the way the plane lose energy (did you attempt a looping ? What do you think ?), and, while I thought that V2 was too fast, I think it's too difficult to reach even 300 knts with V3... It's certain that I need training, but I'm not so sure it will change these characteristics, particularly with an airplane lighter than the real one...