Continuing with my 'glue sniff'. Could one of you 'scasm' wizards possibly come up with a program for adding a distance LOD to an existing model. I think that the ethical concerns would be minimal especially as it is prudent to obtain permission to upload converted aircraft & if you are using the same for your own use, no problemo. This would do wonders for lowering FRs on converted or non-multires CFS2 aircraft. 'Glue sniff #2 would be to make the distance LOD semi transparent & perhaps a little more refined (tho still simple) & make the switch over at a closer distance without spoiling the visual effect too drastically. It might even appear more realistic.
-
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Add-on distance model pt. 2
- Thread starter oldwheat
- Start date
Question
Not a Topic Hijack, Mr. Brown - an associated question.
This has been a nagging question for me going on 4 years...
Does adding MIPs to an image affect frame rates and / or add LOD to an image ?
I've been using BMP2000 to convert image files with 7+ MIPs after repaints and it seems to help with both...
TIA
SC
Not a Topic Hijack, Mr. Brown - an associated question.
This has been a nagging question for me going on 4 years...
Does adding MIPs to an image affect frame rates and / or add LOD to an image ?
I've been using BMP2000 to convert image files with 7+ MIPs after repaints and it seems to help with both...
TIA
SC
That's a very good question! It's been my experience that usually how an image is saved has minimal effect on FRs but never have played with MIP tweaking. It's something that warrants further study. If CFS2 is spared from rendering complex pixels 'out' where they aren't really needed, it would have to help. I've only used BMP2000 for converting AF files to date, perhaps I've been missing something here. It theoretically should even raise the FRs somewhat with multi-res birds. Hmmmm.
....Jagdflieger
Jr. Admin
Looks like a great project OW. Wish I could help.
The B24 Guy
SOH-CM-2022
Hi Oldwheat,
The problem is with the texturing of the "distance model". One really needs to use FSDS or Gmax in order to create the model and map the needed textures.
Adding them in using SCASM is not really that hard.
Regards,
B24Guy
The problem is with the texturing of the "distance model". One really needs to use FSDS or Gmax in order to create the model and map the needed textures.
Adding them in using SCASM is not really that hard.
Regards,
B24Guy
t wouldn't be a major hassle to do a simple distance model or two with FSDS. For the furthest LODs, texture isn't even required. Closer LOD models could be mapped to the stock textures but to my thinking, the most important LODs are that show at a 'distance' where a simple shape would do the job.
Turned Up A Nugget...
... while digging for Diamonds...
SC
=============================
Food for thought:
From Avsim Forum dated :
Oct 14 2004, by Luis Feliz Tirado
[http://forums1.avsim.net/lofiversion/index.php/t79553.html]
Mipmaps are a way for Flight Simulator to display lower resolution textures when an object is far away. If you create a building and use textures that are 1024x1024 pixels in size, Flight Simulator won’t be able to display these textures at that resolution at a certain distance. So, when we save a texture, we also save a copy that is 512x512 pixels, and one that is 256x256 pixels, and 128x128 pixels, etc. These are all saved into one big texture, so we don’t have to manage all these little textures independently. Flight Simulator automatically picks the texture size that it feels is most appropriate. DXTBmp creates mipmaps by default.
You might see some negative talk about mipmaps, especially on aircraft-building forums. This is because on aircraft, mipmapped textures don’t look as sharp as regular textures; however, on scenery objects, using mipmaps is the preferred method.
... while digging for Diamonds...
SC
=============================
Food for thought:
From Avsim Forum dated :
Oct 14 2004, by Luis Feliz Tirado
[http://forums1.avsim.net/lofiversion/index.php/t79553.html]
Mipmaps are a way for Flight Simulator to display lower resolution textures when an object is far away. If you create a building and use textures that are 1024x1024 pixels in size, Flight Simulator won’t be able to display these textures at that resolution at a certain distance. So, when we save a texture, we also save a copy that is 512x512 pixels, and one that is 256x256 pixels, and 128x128 pixels, etc. These are all saved into one big texture, so we don’t have to manage all these little textures independently. Flight Simulator automatically picks the texture size that it feels is most appropriate. DXTBmp creates mipmaps by default.
You might see some negative talk about mipmaps, especially on aircraft-building forums. This is because on aircraft, mipmapped textures don’t look as sharp as regular textures; however, on scenery objects, using mipmaps is the preferred method.
I have played around a little with mipmaps (very little 
) but the results were under-whelming as far as I could tell. It may call for a little more experimentation however. Personally, I believe that textures pixels are just a small part of the whole equation. The game still seems to think that it has to draw all of the parts of the model at any distance unless they are in or missing from separate LODs.
) but the results were under-whelming as far as I could tell. It may call for a little more experimentation however. Personally, I believe that textures pixels are just a small part of the whole equation. The game still seems to think that it has to draw all of the parts of the model at any distance unless they are in or missing from separate LODs.
The B24 Guy
SOH-CM-2022
It would be easy to do it by hand. Just paste in the new LOD and create a "if visable size jump" for it.
Regards,
B24Guy