• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Clockwork Orange

Ickie

SOH Administrator
In 1971 I first seen this great British movie, and last night it was on TCM, I recall being afraid to visit England after seeing this the first time.
 
I think I am correct in thinking that the movie was banned from public viewing in the UK for many years and has only recently had the ban lifted there. I have never seen it personally.
 
I was a research assistant for an academic book on Anthony Burgess, so I know the book and the movie well. What people who've only seen the Kubrick film or only read the edition of the book initially released in the US may not know is that the original English edition (now available in the US) follows Alex for some time after the famous line: "I was cured all right." If you by chance get to listen to the Audiobook version with the preface by Anthony Burgess, he explains the how and why of the discrepancy, so I'll not repeat it here. Another big difference between the book and the film is that the characters as originally drawn are all younger than portrayed in the film. I think Alex was 15 at the start of his narrative. (The other movie I remember thinking this of was Alex Cox's Sid & Nancy. All the actors cast were substantially older than there real-life counterparts) I definitely understand why the studio changed this detail; they had enough troubles getting the film screened as it was. Many critics at the time said the film glorified sexual violence, which was even more unforgivable because of the movie's high level of craft. If I'm dealing with adults, my inclination is to leave it to adults to make that judgement for themselves. I will note that I know thoughtful people who consider A Clockwork Orange to be high art, but have no use for rap music, because they see it as glorifying violence without redeeming social value.

If anyone from SOH does listen to the Audiobook preface, I'd be very interested in hearing what you thought of it. IMO, Burgess seems to respect Kubrick's work but feels that it undermines one of his novel's central questions in its ending. This is nothing unique with writers and filmmakers. Gore Vidal claims he never watches the movie versions of his books, because once the author signs away the film rights, he loses all control over what the studio does with the property. Stephen King has even more serious issues with the way Kubrick handled The Shining, which IMO was King's best work as an author. I think he was even one of the backers behind the Sci-Fi miniseries, but couldn't swear to that.

JAMES
 
Really strange movie, saw it many times in the 70's one of those Cult movies they showed here at the midnite movies..
left me amazed..
 
Yah,

[YOUTUBE]40Xc-9YeWE4[/YOUTUBE]

Some of that good old Ultra Violence. I have a copy and really enjoyed this movie. My wife finds it disturbing that I should like it. I thought Malcolm McDowell was a particularly good choice.

The eye thing really used to bother me until I had PRK on my own eyes.....nothing like smelling your own flesh burning to cure you of the willies.....
 
Back
Top