• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

D.E.I. auto-installer campaign uploaded!

Rami

Rami

Administrator
Staff member
Hey guys,

Before I hop a flight back to scenery building in Europe, I did not want to leave the Pacific without an update to the Dutch East Indies campaign, which will also be an auto-installer. However, I have three ways that I could do this.

1) I could go full-bore. This means that you would have to use a new install rather than have it be compatible with the other two campaign releases. It would use Rhumbaflappy's new watermasks and coastlines, as well as MaskRider's DEI airfields that are strictly compatible with this new scenery, as well as those by Onnogras, which also include GSL ports and oil facilities for the area, again configured for this new scenery setup. In addition, I would also have to use a custom mix of airfields by Onnogras, Xavierb, and MaskRider, which again would not necessarily be compatible with anything else in the Pacific.

2) I could go full-bore retro. This means I would retrofit Onnogras' new scenery and GSL works to the old coastlines, as well as check and see which airfields of his I can use, and which ones I would not be able to. This would also mean checking between the Onnogras and Xavierb versions of airfields and determining which ones I would use. Unlike option one, it would be fully compatible with the other two auto-installers.

3) Basic. Update this package without making any major modifications, and just including everything. All three would be auto-installers, but this one would be virtually unchanged from the one already in the library.

I'm inclined for the second option, myself.
 
Dear Rami.
Since option one would be a great deviation from your previous work, I would prefer option 2 or 3. It also makes it possible to have all those beauties in the same install, using the same planes as you have so nicely done in the first two (we probably all have 15 installs or more already, but there is no need to have a number 16, if it can be awoided) Thank you once again for all your work.
Finn
 
Andrew,

Probably option 2 would be most useful. Unless somebody starts matching coastlines to Rhumbas mesh, I think that's the closest you'll get to a PTO42 install...for now.
 
I need your advice on this one...

I agree, option 2 is the best, even though it means more work for you.

Steve
 
Andrew,

There's no need to adjust Onnogras' GSL scenery for any type of PTO installation. His scenery comes with new coastlines which work with a stock standard installation or with either of Maskrider's options, i.e. his earlier coast/water files or his later watermask files.

As you mentioned, XavierB's scenery, which was designed 10 years ago, conflicts with Onnogras' in a couple of places - Surabaya is one location I can think of.

Kevin
 
Reply...

kdriver said:
Andrew,

There's no need to adjust Onnogras' GSL scenery for any type of PTO installation. His scenery comes with new coastlines which work with a stock standard installation or with either of Maskrider's options, i.e. his earlier coast/water files or his later watermask files.

As you mentioned, XavierB's scenery, which was designed 10 years ago, conflicts with Onnogras' in a couple of places - Surabaya is one location I can think of.

Kevin
Click to expand...

Kevin,

Sorry, but there IS a distinct difference between the old and new watermasks. His files only work with the new ones.
 
Reply...

Good morning,

I have all the aircraft, repaints, sounds, and weapons required for the campaign. However, that's the easy part. :very_drunk:

Now for the hard part...:banghead:

Thanks for all the advice, gents. It's time to get started.
 
Reply...

Good morning,

I want to now shift the question to ships. I'm working to provide more authenticity with this campaign in addition to the scenery updates.

How are people's systems able to handle Usio's ships these days?

I could use Usio's Kagero, Kumano, Ryujo, and landing ships, or I could go the Virtual Navy route. The Virtual Navy has the light carrier Shoho which could double for the Ryujo.

Can I get some recommendations on which ships to use while I am in the process of overhauling the scenery?
 
Virtual Navy Ships are more comparable with my System but Usio Ships are very good quality models. Either one would do.:applause:
 
Andrew,

Retire the VNgator navy, there are better models available, such as:

Collin's Jap Marus & Sampans

Psullkeys Barges & small ships

Wolfis Hog Islander

SS Adventure

Also don't forget

MAS Shipyard for some Jap vessels

Stuart 277 for Jap LCs & smaller DDs, & just about anything else.
 
Reply...

Good morning,

I decided to use the Mas Shoho version, but I am using Collin's troop ships and landing craft, along with several of Usio's ships, including replacement of stock models.

Thanks for the input....and by the way, I know about the .dp category issues with Usio's ships, and I am fixing them as I go.
 
Reply...

Greg,

I am well aware of that pack and use it regularly. Usio's ships (as well as some of Collin's) are legendary for being flak-happy. I got shot down over the fleet testing a mission by my own ack-ack. :very_drunk:
 
Rami said:
Greg,

I am well aware of that pack and use it regularly. Usio's ships (as well as some of Collin's) are legendary for being flak-happy. I got shot down over the fleet testing a mission by my own ack-ack. :very_drunk:
Click to expand...

Not only that, but Usio's crafr are notoriously hard to sink. Pen32Win't files make them more reasonable but still tough.
 
Reply...

Good morning,

Some good news...I just about have the scenery updates complete in terms of the GSL work and the custom airfield package for the campaign. The last step and toughest challenge will be to update the missions themselves.
 
Reply...

Good afternoon,

By tonight, I will have fifty percent of the Japanese missions completed, including the toughest ones, the invasion missions with moving landing craft being targeted.
 
Would like to fix a couple of things before uploading DEI...

Hey guys,

I was wondering if I could get some help fixing a couple of issues here, or if someone knows where I could find fixes.

I have been able to locate and fix some of the .dp files for Usio's ships thanks to Pen32Win. However, the Akagimaru and the Asakamaru do not have altered .dp files.

In addition, Collin's IJN Troopships are murderous with flak. Has anyone, or could anyone, tone these down a bit for me?

In addition, I am looking for suitable .dp replacements for the 330 and 200 liter drop tanks with something a little more fitting for Akemi's A6M2b "Zero" and the Nakajima Ki-43-1k "Oscar" if anyone can make a recommendation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top