I decided I wanted to get in some stick time, so I fired up the PAD Seastar. Overall, it was a satisfying flight, but I noticed a few things. Foremost on the list was the fact that the props were both going in the same direction. That was an easy fix - I just added rotation=1,-1 to the [propeller] section to reverse the rear prop. Then I started digging deeper. I found out that the Seastar uses essentially the same engine as the C208, so I compared the engine settings and they were pretty close. The rated N2 RPM was different (lower), but I can attribute that to the extra prop blade on each engine. Next, I decided to check the propeller specs. With a little creative Googling, I found this:
http://www.mccauley.textron.com/MAG.pdf
Every serious sim user needs this file. It contains operating specs for every McCauley prop setup, including the Seastar. I found it interesting to see that the front and rear are actually slightly different, but I don't think that FS9 can handle different prop specs, so I went with an average where there was a difference. The biggest difference between PAD and the spec sheet was in the beta_max setting, which was about 40° too low. After the tweaks, I took it up and the engines felt pretty believable - at least to someone with absolutely no experience with any real turboprop whatsoever.
Now if someone with a little more experience than my none at all could take a look at the flap settings, I'd certainly appreciate that. The sudden pitch and lift changes with flap angle changes are manageable, but I have a feeling that the real thing may not be as abrupt...
http://www.mccauley.textron.com/MAG.pdf
Every serious sim user needs this file. It contains operating specs for every McCauley prop setup, including the Seastar. I found it interesting to see that the front and rear are actually slightly different, but I don't think that FS9 can handle different prop specs, so I went with an average where there was a difference. The biggest difference between PAD and the spec sheet was in the beta_max setting, which was about 40° too low. After the tweaks, I took it up and the engines felt pretty believable - at least to someone with absolutely no experience with any real turboprop whatsoever.
Now if someone with a little more experience than my none at all could take a look at the flap settings, I'd certainly appreciate that. The sudden pitch and lift changes with flap angle changes are manageable, but I have a feeling that the real thing may not be as abrupt...