• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

exhaust ports

Terry

Terry

SOH-CM-2016
I picked up this F-82 photo from Plane a day this morning. It shows 2 exhaust ports per cylinder. I have several other photos of both the F-82 and P-82 which all have 1 port per cylinder. Anyone know why this is?
 
That's an F-82E, it had a different exhaust stack arrangement than the P-82B, but the engines were still Allison V-1710's.
 
Allison 1710's were a four valve per cylinder mill. Each exhaust valve benefitted from an individual port. Earlier exhaust stacks would relieve two ports each, later tech extractor types were setup one each per port.

P-40's and early P-51 series are good visual example to compare with the F-82. Another parrallel comparison is looking at a Merlin powered Spitfire Mk.I versus a Mk.IX.

Aviation hot-rodding.
 
magoo said:
Allison 1710's were a four valve per cylinder mill. Each exhaust valve benefitted from an individual port. Earlier exhaust stacks would relieve two ports each, later tech extractor types were setup one each per port.

P-40's and early P-51 series are good visual example to compare with the F-82. Another parrallel comparison is looking at a Merlin powered Spitfire Mk.I versus a Mk.IX.

Aviation hot-rodding.
Click to expand...

That's the answer I was looking for. Thanks!:salute:
 
Hi,

yep, the early Spits had 2 cylinders per exhaust port while the Bf-109 had 1. Each engine manufacturer came to a slightly different solution, whatever turned out to work better.

Best regards,
Volker
 
Even on the 1710 there are different configurations, depending on the mount it was bolted to.
On some you do have a 2 in 1 collector for each of the cylinders.
The theory being that the two ports are equalized in flow speed by doing so.
Joe&Pat Yancey's engine shop is based at my home base L67 and about every other week one Allison or another is running on the test stand...exhaust configurations galore.

Cheers
Stefan
 
Siamesed exhaust ports have long been used in competition car engines, not common today but the Alfa Romeo 158/159 and Maserati's 8CLT used dual 8 into 1 systems on their blown straight 8 Grand Prix cars, with Maserati following the same pattern with their 4CLT straight 4 efforts.
REPCO turned out an experimental 3 litre V8 around 1969/1970(?) sporting exhaust ports on the inside and outside of each cylinder head.
Never used for obvious exhaust system problems!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top