Interesting enough why hackers demand payment in bitcons, plus very hard to track. Now a Nvidia card specific for bitcon mining.
I'm going to preface this by making it clear...I'm answering TuFun's question utilizing example and illustration. Not wanting to step on any toes at all.
I went to the national debt clock today. Two entries of interest are Gold and Silver which are calculations of the money supply versus the actual amount of metal that has been taken out of the ground...world wide, year to year.
Gold was $6,741.00 and Silver was $817.00. As of today, there is no entry for Bitcoin, but you can still buy silver at spot...$17.00.
The hackers and speculators want their ransom paid in Bitcoin due to the skyrocketing speculation of the physical coins as a hedge against economic uncertainties. It is a valid strategy for metals like Gold and Silver, but Bitcoin is only as valuable as what the traders agree upon. Of course, the same can be said for any commodity or share of a company.
I've watched Bitcoin as well as the Dinar, Dong and even the Yuan over the years. Speculation has been all over the place, and the security represented by holding the physical currency is entirely dependent upon the buying power of that currency against a barrel of oil, which is only sold in USD. Up until now, at least...but that is changing rapidly as the BRICS alliance and most recently Qatar have indicated.
When the bond/derivatives bubble reaches the point where everyone runs for the door at once (2008 on steroids), every thing else will correct in real time. So where does that leave Bitcoin? The smart trader would have converted the speculated prices into something tangible...like gold, silver, real property or even cash (surprisingly).
I would wager that this is the strategy amongst the hacking community, but then, many of these traders are agents for other entities who back these wild speculations. The big question with Bitcoin is who is behind it? I'm not talking about Satoshi Nakamoto...who is probably a straw man entity created by the originators in 2009. If the original open source authors were simply looking for another venue to exploit fractional reserve banking strategy, then the entire scheme is as vulnerable as any other debt based paper commodity.
The Bitcoin strategy came on the heels of the TARP bail in and quantitative easing bailouts, about 29 Trillion dollars all told, which by the way was pumped back into the system and re-inflated by the legitimate "hackers" on Wall Street who began spinning the algorithms. The entire process is mind boggling in it's scope and scale. The numbers represented on the
exchanges are wildly out of proportion to corporate and state GDP figures, which total about 58 Trillion globally. In reality, the
interest on the global debt can never be repaid at current GDP.
In real world terms, the gold and silver
could see massive corrections to the upside, possibly beyond the extrapolated numbers on the debt clock. Bitcoin may or may not survive the global tsunami of currency corrections, but the value of that commodity will only be represented by what it can "buy".
My basic position on Bitcoin has always been
extremely cautious. I like the idea of the transparent block chain ledger. Bitcoin Services chart is another thing entirely...especially this month. When speculation on the "commodity" arrives at a place where legitimate trade has been usurped by hacks, ransomware and agents provocateur for "anonymous" benefactors, the entire scheme goes completely off my radar, and into the commode.
As always...IMO. My analysis and two bits will still buy a cup of coffee at todays prices.
A picture is worth a thousand words