• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Getting reflectance to work... or not!!

DaveQ

DaveQ

Charter Member
I've been tinkering with PBR for maybe two years now and, having finally got P3Dv5.1, HF 1 to work on my ancient rig, I foolishly thought getting reflectance to work would be a cinch. No! The metallic texture has metal in the red channel, ambient occlusion in the green and smoothness in the alpha. But adding reflectance with MCX does nothing, whatever I do to the blue channel. WTF am I doing wrong??:banghead:

The latest conversion is the Aircraft Factory P-51H which I've been playing with for about 4 months. I have PBR skins for a few ANG paints as well as having re-positioned Warbirdsim pylons and rocket stubs and added Warbirdsim drop-tanks, rockets and bombs. Also, being a huge fan of 'what-if' I've done an RAF Griffon conversion with bits carved off the RealAir Spit XIV and some 20mm cannon, and slung an arrestor hook on the back, again from the Warbirdsim Sea Horse. All models look much better in v5.1 with HF1 than v4.5, but there's no difference with reflectance added at all.

50856903062_d110aa401a_b.jpg


The only 197th FS (the Copperheads) 'H' The copper paint looks good.

50856810011_6bb3e2586c_b.jpg


50856809791_9dc0b2bdab_b.jpg


50856809616_ec5d54183f_b.jpg


615 Sqdn. R Aux. AF

..and finally in the Navy

50856087773_16540367d2_b.jpg


Anybody any suggestions? (Apart from forget it, they look OK!)

DaveQ
 
Hi Dave,

I'm probably talking about stuff you already do, but when I have used MCX I set the material to be 'PBR material', check that 'smoothness source' is metallic alpha, and then I add the metallic texture.

I see there is a 'metallic has reflectance' option, I assume you've tried that already?

When experimenting it would appear that the metallic alpha if black is not reflective, but if white is insanely reflective. I've not set the reflectance options before, only metallic diffuse and alpha.

Oh and forget it they look okay LOL
 
Thanks David. I did your B-58 for v4.5 a while back but it needs work for v5.1. Also it doesn't seem to like MCX 1.40. Keeps corrupting the pod animations/visibility.

Here's what I've got so far...

Last year's try - some issues with aluminium colour.

50860054851_e556151bd2_b.jpg


Latest try. The nacelles need work.

50859340113_24015211ce_b.jpg


There's a lot of work in converting every paint but I'm abandoning reflectance for now...!

DaveQ
 
DaveQ said:
Thanks David. I did your B-58 for v4.5 a while back but it needs work for v5.1. Also it doesn't seem to like MCX 1.40. Keeps corrupting the pod animations/visibility.

Here's what I've got so far...

Last year's try - some issues with aluminium colour.

50860054851_e556151bd2_b.jpg


Latest try. The nacelles need work.

50859340113_24015211ce_b.jpg


There's a lot of work in converting every paint but I'm abandoning reflectance for now...!

DaveQ
Click to expand...

Hi Dave

I found that too but once I got the latest MCX that visibility bug was fixed!
 
Yep! That's done it! Can now work on the Hustler without it corrupting. Thanks for the tip.

DaveQ
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top