wolfi
SOH-CM-2025
Hi my friends, I'm sure a few always noticed that I'm not very often on this website.
I was more or less affected (emotional)with a criminal case in Arizona, where a 8 year old boy should have killed his dad and another roommate. They would try the boy as adult with adult charges! Now at last it stand in the juvenile law. I will explain you in a view short sentence what happened: the boy should have killed both man with a single action caliber 22 rifle, you have to reload the gun after each shot with a new bullet. There is absolutely no real motive to shoot both man. the boy confessed to the crime to two police officers with no relatives or attorney with him. the evidence taken on the crime scene doesn`t fit, there are no fingerprint's on the weapon he was supposed to use, only on two cartridges they found print´s. his dad was a hunter and the guns aren't locked away, so there was free access to the guns every time. the boy stated in the first part of the police interrogation that he found both man shoot, but they are suffering, so he shoot those man to end their suffering. ( his dad take him often away hunting, so he learned to do so with animals). The boy was arrested and locked up in a juvenile prison, in a single cell with no contact to other children, no contact visits with his biological mother ( they have to speak through a wall of glass) no picture of mom…..
he was charged for premeditated murder in two cases! In the detention hearing he plead not guilty!
…. for the whole story you find a link to a website below.
two competency ( competence to stand trial) test's where done, one stated the boy is incompetent, he doesn`t know the proceeding's and what they mean (who really known's it)
now, a change of plea has taken place yesterday, the boy plead for a lesser charge guilty. He pleaded guilty to one count of negligent homicide in the death of his father's friend (six shoot's and hits with a single action caliber 22 rifle).
the plea forced the boy under government advise until he is 18, he can spend several years in Detention (juvenile prison) or in closed health facilities, for a crime he probably newer do, the evidence point about 50/50 in favor for the boy or State attorney. In a trial he would win, but the state can drop all times a charge to refill it later when he is 15 and can be legal charged as adult!
What has happened yesterday, the boy was coerced by the state attorney and his lawyer in to a lie, to prevent the state to drop a charge. the judge accept this deal (lie) the judge also knows, that one of the competency test stated he is incompetent to understand all those proceedings and the other competency evaluation will state the same I think. the boy signed himself a plea he defiantly don't understand, his mother didn't sign and his guardian at litem never has seen the last version of the deal.
OK, I just want to explain why I'm mostly absent from this great online communities here, Unfortunately I think the case will take more time, so don't aspect me here very often in the next few weeks. all my work on my project´s had stopped so please don’t await something new in the near future.
I also don’t want to discuss this case here so for the moderator's please close this thread
thank you for reading
-all is IMO
wolfi
for all who are interested two links
discussion board (no guest view, you have to log in)
http://lethimgo.21.forumer.com/index.php
A site with a lot of information about this case
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewProfile&friendID=435515258
I was more or less affected (emotional)with a criminal case in Arizona, where a 8 year old boy should have killed his dad and another roommate. They would try the boy as adult with adult charges! Now at last it stand in the juvenile law. I will explain you in a view short sentence what happened: the boy should have killed both man with a single action caliber 22 rifle, you have to reload the gun after each shot with a new bullet. There is absolutely no real motive to shoot both man. the boy confessed to the crime to two police officers with no relatives or attorney with him. the evidence taken on the crime scene doesn`t fit, there are no fingerprint's on the weapon he was supposed to use, only on two cartridges they found print´s. his dad was a hunter and the guns aren't locked away, so there was free access to the guns every time. the boy stated in the first part of the police interrogation that he found both man shoot, but they are suffering, so he shoot those man to end their suffering. ( his dad take him often away hunting, so he learned to do so with animals). The boy was arrested and locked up in a juvenile prison, in a single cell with no contact to other children, no contact visits with his biological mother ( they have to speak through a wall of glass) no picture of mom…..
he was charged for premeditated murder in two cases! In the detention hearing he plead not guilty!
…. for the whole story you find a link to a website below.
two competency ( competence to stand trial) test's where done, one stated the boy is incompetent, he doesn`t know the proceeding's and what they mean (who really known's it)
now, a change of plea has taken place yesterday, the boy plead for a lesser charge guilty. He pleaded guilty to one count of negligent homicide in the death of his father's friend (six shoot's and hits with a single action caliber 22 rifle).
the plea forced the boy under government advise until he is 18, he can spend several years in Detention (juvenile prison) or in closed health facilities, for a crime he probably newer do, the evidence point about 50/50 in favor for the boy or State attorney. In a trial he would win, but the state can drop all times a charge to refill it later when he is 15 and can be legal charged as adult!
What has happened yesterday, the boy was coerced by the state attorney and his lawyer in to a lie, to prevent the state to drop a charge. the judge accept this deal (lie) the judge also knows, that one of the competency test stated he is incompetent to understand all those proceedings and the other competency evaluation will state the same I think. the boy signed himself a plea he defiantly don't understand, his mother didn't sign and his guardian at litem never has seen the last version of the deal.
OK, I just want to explain why I'm mostly absent from this great online communities here, Unfortunately I think the case will take more time, so don't aspect me here very often in the next few weeks. all my work on my project´s had stopped so please don’t await something new in the near future.
I also don’t want to discuss this case here so for the moderator's please close this thread
thank you for reading
-all is IMO
wolfi
for all who are interested two links
discussion board (no guest view, you have to log in)
http://lethimgo.21.forumer.com/index.php
A site with a lot of information about this case
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewProfile&friendID=435515258