bearcat241
SOH-CM-2023
Its more logical to tax on citizenship than location. In theory and law, a citizen is entitled to all the benefits afforded by his/her domestic government, paid for by the collective citizenry in taxes, wherever they reside as long as they maintain their citizenship. To avoid double-taxation, one would simply renounce their native citizenship and claim their adopted country solely. Why would an American want to be afforded all the rights and benefits of the U.S. without paying their share of the bill?...seems a bit self-serving to me.
Its like owning homes in the US and Europe, but only living in Europe year round. You still have to maintain the payments and taxes on your US property whether you live there or not. The only way out of the obligation is to relinquish ownership by selling it or assigning it through a legal assumption, but you must give up the title.
Its like owning homes in the US and Europe, but only living in Europe year round. You still have to maintain the payments and taxes on your US property whether you live there or not. The only way out of the obligation is to relinquish ownership by selling it or assigning it through a legal assumption, but you must give up the title.