• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

It goes BOOOM!

This reminds me to restore my Falcon 4 + Falcon AF checklists an manuals.

We'll see how realistic it will be. Falcon is the benchmark to beat ;)

The aerosoft one didn't reach the level


"bandit is at your seven o'clock, less than one mile" :gameon:

Cheers
Martin aka "Hollywood"
Falcon Unified Team
 
Hi David,

I'm dying to know how you managed to do realtime "parameterisation" of an explosion effect in the scenery (in time and in place, based on aircraft's place/speed/attitude calculations).
Because that's the basics of this trick, right ?

Great job indeed !!:applause:
And Yes, very unique in MSFS.

Just wondering after looking at the video: what has happened to the scenery object if I would fly back over it ? Actually destroyed ?? :icon_lol:
Although I realize that would even be the next (even more impressive) step forward in MSFS design ....

:ernae: Rob Barendregt
 
Rob,

I wish I knew how Michael did the gauge. There's absolutely heaps on innovative items in this F-16, such as a coded fly by wire system, the CCIP, um..and other stuff I still need to learn about ! lol.

If you would like, I can happily put you in contact with Michael and he might be able to pass on some info. As for the target you hit..well that's still there. The droppable ordnance has no effect on static scenery, but well... it looks SO COOL! lol.

I would like to touch base with you in the nearby future regarding my latest WIP, the F-35B Lighting II. Needless to say, I'm looking for VTOL.. :)

DB.
 
MartinM said:
This reminds me to restore my Falcon 4 + Falcon AF checklists an manuals.

We'll see how realistic it will be. Falcon is the benchmark to beat ;)

The aerosoft one didn't reach the level


"bandit is at your seven o'clock, less than one mile" :gameon:

Cheers
Martin aka "Hollywood"
Falcon Unified Team
Click to expand...


Martin,

Please don't be under any illusions, no F-16 in FSX can come close to Falcon 4. Simply because of the limitations of the sim engine itself.

However with that being said, we're doing our very best to make it as accurate as possible within the limitations we have.
 
MartinM said:
This reminds me to restore my Falcon 4 + Falcon AF checklists an manuals.

We'll see how realistic it will be. Falcon is the benchmark to beat ;)

The aerosoft one didn't reach the level


"bandit is at your seven o'clock, less than one mile" :gameon:

Cheers
Martin aka "Hollywood"
Falcon Unified Team
Click to expand...

I wonder how hard it would be to change ATC chatter instead of saying "Traffic Alert," saying "Bogey" or "Contact."
 
CCRP? Unfortunately that requires being able to manually set a reference point in the sim world. Something that AFAIK isn't possible within the limits of XML coding.

Whilst we've posted that challenge to Michael (Yes, we're never happy! lol) I doubt you'll see it anytime soon, if ever.

DB.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top