• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Lancair Evolution

Daveroo

Members +
is there one in development from anyone?..i sure hope so,its such a cool looking plane,looks fast even parked in a dark hangar.
 
LancairEvolution.jpg



EWW!
 
I gotta say...Only the Legacy and the IV series(IV-P and IV turboprop) have ever appealed to me. The IV turbo prop is even better performing than the Evolution if I recall.
 
We had a IV-P turboprop crash offshore in Duluth this summer... Still don't know what happened

 
Last edited:
I would love to see Ant do one of these. Or at least update his IV to a IV-P. His IV is still one of my favorite GA planes to scoot about in FSX. :)
 
..The IV Turboprop is outright dangerous in my opinion.. We had a big-businessman kill himself in one a year or two back, in Boise.

- Joseph
 
..The IV Turboprop is outright dangerous in my opinion.. We had a big-businessman kill himself in one a year or two back, in Boise.

- Joseph

I don't have any experience operating the turboprop version but I'd tend to agree. In our accident, we simply think the pilot got behind. Our field was VFR but IMC straight ahead - in addition to that the N86NW pilot was carrying what I'd call a fuel bladder, his route would take him back across the atlantic. We wonder if there was a CG shift on takeoff... It was really nuts - my first fatal in seven years with the FAA.
 
Don't blame high performance aircraft for mishaps due to pilots being behind. The Navy trains students in a T-6...much higher performance than a Lancair IV. The difference is a disciplined training program that mitigates risk and a culture of rigid adherence to an SOP.

I flew a Lancair 320 (another "dangerous" plane) safely for a year. Nothing unsafe about the plane. It was demanding of attention, yes, but given the correct training it's perfectly safe.

Ill admit the thing had more in common with flying a jet than a 172 though...
 
Personally I did not like the Evolution when I first saw one at the FBO I work at, but now after 2 years or so I have seen several, and they have grown on me .... real ramp presence and almost fighter like landing gear, to each his own I suppose, but I'd love to have one for FSX ! Mike :wavey:
 
Any time a GA aircraft starts setting performance records you know that it requires more than average skills to fly it. Its like the Mu-2...The thing flies like a jet and has special characteristics that require special training. Put some bloke in Lancair who thinks he can fly it like his Cessna 182 and he will get bitten.
 
Personally I did not like the Evolution when I first saw one at the FBO I work at, but now after 2 years or so I have seen several, and they have grown on me .... real ramp presence and almost fighter like landing gear, to each his own I suppose, but I'd love to have one for FSX ! Mike :wavey:

+1. Single engine and slippery...what's not to like.
 
Those round windows and curvy lines make it look like a Rutan design. Add a canard in there or a strangely placed second engine and it would be a ringer for sure!
 
Back
Top