• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Learjets coming soon

Who is doing the other Lear 35? I don't know who "Skip67" is. Judging just from VC texturing, I like the one Skip67 is showing over Flysimware.
 
I think the one Skip67 is doing is P3Dv2 only. Looks very nice but I'll be missing out on it unfortunately as I'm still FSXA only.
 
I prefer the VC and outside texturing of the Skip67 version.
But a FS AC is many other things. Flysimware has their "VC style" which is not to convincing, but their gauges are always easy to read and the airfiles of the C402 and the MU-2 that I have are very nice. On the other hand, I find the lack of working condition levers to be a negative point.

Time will see. I will wait and see reactions.
 
It is interesting on how some guys make a decision based on work in progress screen shots.
At least in the context of the VC texturing, Flysimware has a history of doing relatively nice looking VC's (layout-wise) but their texture work is lacking, something they have admitted and have been trying to improve on. So, given that bit of information from past experience and comparing the two VC's side by side, Skip67 (whoever that is, as no one seems to know) has already surpassed what Flysimware is displaying. . .and FSW's VC won't improve much as far as the texturing is concerned. There are other subtle differences in the exterior modeling that give the edge to skip67 as well. What can't be assumed though is how the finished products will perform. . .there's always a chance that there is a trade off of sorts. . .not quite the best VC and exterior but an FDE that is dead on. . . .also will one model transition to more than one Sim easily where the other is a one sim only aircraft. Lot's to consider and assumptions will abound as WIP shots are added. . .human nature.
 
Back
Top