• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

"Liftoff", by Michael Collins

PRB

Administrator
Staff member
I'm reading this book. Published in 1988, it's more of an engineering history of the space program, which is why I'm enjoying it, and learning new and interesting things.

On the Apollo 1 fire. After that accident, they went to a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen, but only while on the ground. In orbit they continued to use 100% O2, at 5 PSI. At that pressure, pure oxygen is no more flammable than the 15 PSI oxygen nitrogen mixture we experience down here. While on the ground, they can't pressurize the ship to 5 PSI, and in fact that pressurize it to a bit over sea level pressure, for leak checking. 100% O2 and 15 PSI is a bomb waiting to go off. Hind sight is a wonderful thing...

On the Apollo Soyuz mission. Among the engineering challenges they faces was the fact that the Soviet ship was pressurized to 15 PSI with an oxygen/nitrogen mixture, while the Apollo was at our usual 5% O2. Can't open the hatch between the two ships that way! Also, when designing the docking adapter, neither the Russians nor the US was willing to “be the female” in the “docking experience”, and so a special “gender ambiguous” docking system had to be designed. Is that funny or what? Can you imagine the engineering meeting when this topic first came up?

"so, the docking syetm will be..."
"whoa, hold up."
"what?"
"that's not going to do at all"
"what?"
"you have us as the female end and you're ship has the male end."
"right, so?"
"well, we want to be the male"
"you can't, we're already the male"
"well, we're not going to be the female"
"somebody has to be the female..."
"you be the female"
"no"
"why not?"
"shut up"
"you shut up"


Anyhow, it's a good read!
 
Back
Top