• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

More FSX payware without a VC?

sorry im not a fan of them anyway after the poor support i got for walk n follow, im staying clear of these guys
 
jeansy said:
sorry im not a fan of them anyway after the poor support i got for walk n follow, im staying clear of these guys
Click to expand...
The FSX Active Cam .. yip , nah , nothing like AC , the setup issues , i have my own stories ..
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
I remember when I had first started making planes. I didnt do the VC's. I didnt know how, nor couldnt fathom doing things like switches, let alone arm rests, latches, gauge faces. Its like making a ship in a bottle. Here you have to figure out how to make things 'in' the fuselage you just created.

Someone finally talked me into making a plane with a basic VC. From there, VC's slowly started getting easier.

I was glad that Ito-Sahn finally started making VC's. So much you can do with them. But its a big hurdle for designers when you 'cross over' into VC territory. Almost a fear, lol...



Bill
 
Lionheart said:
I remember when I had first started making planes. I didnt do the VC's. I didnt know how, nor couldnt fathom doing things like switches, let alone arm rests, latches, gauge faces. Its like making a ship in a bottle. Here you have to figure out how to make things 'in' the fuselage you just created.

Someone finally talked me into making a plane with a basic VC. From there, VC's slowly started getting easier.

I was glad that Ito-Sahn finally started making VC's. So much you can do with them. But its a big hurdle for designers when you 'cross over' into VC territory. Almost a fear, lol...



Bill
Click to expand...
its also one of the hardest things to find info
on older planes
but i have to have one myself now
never thought i would say that
H
 
I can tolerate flying without a vc, but I very much prefer using a vc instead of a 2d panel. It's kind of weird, but these days, I may download the occasional freeware plane without a vc, but I really feel like I can't justify *purchasing* an aircraft that doesn't have a vc. It just feels like the plane isn't 'finished' to me. Just my opinion.
 
empeck said:
For me a good VC is even more important than exterior.
Click to expand...

+1

It is rare that I even switch to a third person view unless I am in a low-wing and trying to get a view of something below me. A mediocre external model I can live with, but the VC has to be top notch.

A2A, Lotus Sim, and Real Air crank out the most polished addons available for the same price as the other guys... if the competition expects to have a snowballs chance in hell of staying competitive, they need to consider stepping their game up.
 
Thats the teaser for the C-27. At least Iris advertised the word and also didnt forget to mention WIP and Im sure David wont forget the VC or flop like some. I have 110% confidence in Iris and David and Team. Matter in fact im going to purchase the tease, why they were honest and truth in there Advertising and also I want a C-27J in Canada SAR.
 
CG_1976 said:
Thats the teaser for the C-27. At least Iris advertised the word and also didnt forget to mention WIP and Im sure David wont forget the VC or flop like some. I have 110% confidence in Iris and David and Team. Matter in fact im going to purchase the tease, why they were honest and truth in there Advertising and also I want a C-27J in Canada SAR.
Click to expand...

True. And they don't charge the full-price for a WIP product.
 
I am not sure I approve of developers selling half completed models, even as a taster!

Anticipation (and good screen shots) always make a purchase more exciting for me, when the final product is ready. Good job car manufacturers don't make FS add-ons too! I will await the full Spartan with a nice VC!!!
 
Captain Sim has done this for a long time, cheap outside model and then all insides......well its a way of marketing. I agree with CG_1976 about Iris, they will come out with a good VC for the C-27, their models are tops....For Twelve Baloogas the teaser is not bad....but I would prefer seeing the VC right away with the model like so many others do......:sleep:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top