• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Native Van's RV-7

As someone who strictly flies in the cockpit I'll be waiting for it to have a custom cockpit, but the developer has already stated that's planned. Looking forward to it!
 
I liked its virtual cockpit, but I preferred it analogical, but it's very good


CIp912L.jpg


P3tXKrT.jpg
 
I like it - great freeware and he's got a nice model and decent textures. Some people are a little upset about the G1000 NXi (usually is a G3X) but the NXi is so much more powerful in the sim than any other avionics at the moment.

rvext by Ryan Butterworth, on Flickr

rvint by Ryan Butterworth, on Flickr
 
The dev said it's new WIP - he's got it based off the CAP 10 flight model at the moment. It's underpowered I'd say right now. I was doing about 140-150 ktas at cruise. I think the real RV7 can do around 180 ktas at 8000 ft / 75% power. But he said he's working on it.

Other than the perf numbers, and the G1000 cockpit which isn't really changed from the default cessna setup, it's nimble and agile like the real RV7. It honestly reminds me of flying the old Baytower for FSX. You gotta be dancing on the pedals though for takeoff and landing. I'd say that's pretty realistic for that portion.
 
ryanbatc said:
The dev said it's new WIP - he's got it based off the CAP 10 flight model at the moment. It's underpowered I'd say right now. I was doing about 140-150 ktas at cruise. I think the real RV7 can do around 180 ktas at 8000 ft / 75% power.
Click to expand...

The cruise speeds of Van's aircraft are dependent on the installed engine (usually (I)O-320, (I)O-360 and some bigger, but not normal (Van's says airframe design range is 150 to 215 HP)). The airframe never exceed speed is about 220 mph (Van's website lists "top speed" as 217 mph). So, depending on which RV-7 you are trying to simulate, 180 knots is a bigger "engined" RV-7 (especially at 75% power). I would say, 150 knots at 75% is much closer to the performance of most RV-7s.
 
rvn817j said:
The cruise speeds of Van's aircraft are dependent on the installed engine (usually (I)O-320, (I)O-360 and some bigger, but not normal (Van's says airframe design range is 150 to 215 HP)). The airframe never exceed speed is about 220 mph (Van's website lists "top speed" as 217 mph). So, depending on which RV-7 you are trying to simulate, 180 knots is a bigger "engined" RV-7 (especially at 75% power). I would say, 150 knots at 75% is much closer to the performance of most RV-7s.
Click to expand...

Great info here! Since I don't have to pay for "real" fuel - give me the bigger engine. :biggrin-new:
 
rvn817j said:
The cruise speeds of Van's aircraft are dependent on the installed engine (usually (I)O-320, (I)O-360 and some bigger, but not normal (Van's says airframe design range is 150 to 215 HP)). The airframe never exceed speed is about 220 mph (Van's website lists "top speed" as 217 mph). So, depending on which RV-7 you are trying to simulate, 180 knots is a bigger "engined" RV-7 (especially at 75% power). I would say, 150 knots at 75% is much closer to the performance of most RV-7s.
Click to expand...

150 ktas? Seems slow. You've flown one but I've also worked a lot of RV's as a controller and they cook. The radar is showing ground speed but I can easily guestimate their TAS based on wind. I guess I'm thinking of their book specs which I think are in mph... 207 mph at 75% power at 8000 ft. (almost 180 KTAS) Perhaps that is the more powerful engine but I'd hope the developer is making that one hehe. I need to go fast!

Are you still out of Airlake? I worked at FCM for about three years (Duluth before that) and now am at Minneapolis Center.
 
ryanbatc said:
Are you still out of Airlake? I worked at FCM for about three years (Duluth before that) and now am at Minneapolis Center.
Click to expand...

Yes. (And many of us want it to remain a non-towered field, but expansion plans may change that.) Are you in the Farmington facility? I built the first new hangar on the south side of Airlake this year. You're welcome to stop by if you are so inclined. PM me and I'll send you contact information.
 
Saw this one pop up and as a fan of the RV series, good to get the IRL knowledge Jay. Hope to track down a good RV-8 in the future (when I make big airline pay).
 
Victory103 said:
Hope to track down a good RV-8 in the future (when I make big airline pay).
Click to expand...

Got my certificate of airworthiness 10/99 and have never regretted it one second. I think big airline pay is an illusion...do it sooner than later.
 
"""Does anyone know if the canopy opens and closes?"""

If you turn your gaze backwards, you will discover a rectangular, gray handle at the top of the canopy frame - click there ...

Dieter
 
kdl said:
"""Does anyone know if the canopy opens and closes?"""

If you turn your gaze backwards, you will discover a rectangular, gray handle at the top of the canopy frame - click there ...

Dieter
Click to expand...

Thank you for that information.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top