-
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
P-40 Warhawk panel V2
- Thread starter gius
- Start date
misson
Charter Member
gius
Charter Member
Cfs2 P-40 wide panel.zip
A new entry has been added to Add-Ons Library, category CFS 2 Panels Add-Ons
Description: A panel in high resolution for the P-40 Warhawks models by Iris Simulation.
To check it out, rate it or add comments, visit Cfs2 P-40 wide panel.zip
The comments you make there will appear in the posts below.
A new entry has been added to Add-Ons Library, category CFS 2 Panels Add-Ons
Description: A panel in high resolution for the P-40 Warhawks models by Iris Simulation.
To check it out, rate it or add comments, visit Cfs2 P-40 wide panel.zip
The comments you make there will appear in the posts below.
Sarg Willy
SOH-CM-2014
Thanks Gius , I ll check it out ,
watchdog22
Piston Broke
Looks great Gius. Which P40 model is it for? KM, FDG2 or another?
gius
Charter Member
Watchdog, it's for the Iris Warhawk, but, replacing the VC entries in Panel.cfg, you can adapt it to every model.
Thanks for your opinion,
Gius
Very nice looking P-40 panel, and this is from someone who doesn't hardly fly CFS2.
One minor note though, Look at the framing on either side of the windscreen. On models with the diagonal bracing, it isn't symmetrical from left to right. It took a while for me to notice this in photographs.
- Ivan.
One minor note though, Look at the framing on either side of the windscreen. On models with the diagonal bracing, it isn't symmetrical from left to right. It took a while for me to notice this in photographs.
- Ivan.
gius
Charter Member
Hi Ivan,
congrats firstly for your outstanding Cfs1 planes!! Now i'm cooperating with Gaucho_59 in order to improve my bitmap, but i'll look more attently at the photos to correct my panel,
Thanks,
Gius
kelticheart
Charter Member
Un gran bel lavoro, Gius! (A great job, Gius!)
Although I do not use a 16:9 monitor, this panel looks real nice and real close to WWII Warhawk cockpit pictures I saw.
I repute myself lucky I was able to get a nice 4:3 19" LCD Philips Brilliance three years ago, I wish I had more spending guts and got a 21" instead, but the bigger size was not on sale and its price was a bit off my budget! Now 4:3 monitors are almost impossible to find, but CFS2 looks so much better on them!
Back to topic. If I may offer a suggestion Gius, the instrument layout is as faithful as it can be to the real one, but you need a radiator temperature gauge in place of the cylinder head temp., normally utilised for air-cooled radials.
You can get it from either Spitfire or Hurricane CFS1 gauge set or from MAPE Luftwaffe multi-engine gauge set. Gauge n.1 usually works for single-engined aircrafts, besides it looks real close to those early USAAF round radiator gauges.
Do not use the rad gauge included in CFS1 P-51 Mustang set: it simply does not work, the temperature reading is always the same, from cold engine at startup to hot engine at full power.
Cheers!
KH
Although I do not use a 16:9 monitor, this panel looks real nice and real close to WWII Warhawk cockpit pictures I saw.
I repute myself lucky I was able to get a nice 4:3 19" LCD Philips Brilliance three years ago, I wish I had more spending guts and got a 21" instead, but the bigger size was not on sale and its price was a bit off my budget! Now 4:3 monitors are almost impossible to find, but CFS2 looks so much better on them!
Back to topic. If I may offer a suggestion Gius, the instrument layout is as faithful as it can be to the real one, but you need a radiator temperature gauge in place of the cylinder head temp., normally utilised for air-cooled radials.
You can get it from either Spitfire or Hurricane CFS1 gauge set or from MAPE Luftwaffe multi-engine gauge set. Gauge n.1 usually works for single-engined aircrafts, besides it looks real close to those early USAAF round radiator gauges.
Do not use the rad gauge included in CFS1 P-51 Mustang set: it simply does not work, the temperature reading is always the same, from cold engine at startup to hot engine at full power.
Cheers!
KH
Hello Gius,
Thanks for the compliment for the CFS1 stuff.
Believe it or not, I have also been looking at building a late model long-tail P-40 from my very old P-40E. The problem is that although I designed the P-40E with William Wylam's dimensional drawings as a reference, just simply adding a 20.7 inch plug before the Fin and Rudder doesn't make the aircraft look right any more. I believe that was all that was done on the real aircraft but doing that to my model makes it disagree with photographs of the actual aeroplane. I am still looking for Fuselage Station drawings to see what the actual changes were.
One other comment about the P-40 Panel: I believe all models of the P-40 actually had three fuel tanks installed. I believe your panel only shows a Main and Aux tank. There are two tanks installed in tandem in the wing center section under the cockpit floor and a cylindrical tank installed behind the cockpit. I cheated a bit on my P-40s by using the fuel selector from the stock CFS1 FW 190A.
- Ivan.
miamieagle
Charter Member
Thank you!
It looks very nice and I will download it.
However, I am of two minds about it:
1. I like the way the black central panel stands out forward from the rear green areas. That is a 3d effect, illusory, but good.
2.On the same theme, sometimes I think that the black fore panel does not seem to blend too well with the rear green areas, as if it does not belong...
It is weird how things look one moment this way, and the next moment the other way.
However, congratulations on a fine product that I will get if I can find it. (I have problems locating things in the library through its 'search' window.
Nick
However, I am of two minds about it:
1. I like the way the black central panel stands out forward from the rear green areas. That is a 3d effect, illusory, but good.
2.On the same theme, sometimes I think that the black fore panel does not seem to blend too well with the rear green areas, as if it does not belong...
It is weird how things look one moment this way, and the next moment the other way.
However, congratulations on a fine product that I will get if I can find it. (I have problems locating things in the library through its 'search' window.
Nick
gius
Charter Member
Hello guys,
Thanks for the appreciations:
1) to Ivan and Stefano: i'm preparing a new version of my panel with the help of Gaucho_59, who is a friend of mine and also a good artist, so i can upload a new version that will include modifies both to the bitmap and to the gauges, i will use your suggestions.
2) to Jinx: i must say that is the first panel entirely made by me so i have still much to learn, but i'm hoping, in the future, to considerably improve my techniques.
Bye,
Gius
Thanks for the appreciations:
1) to Ivan and Stefano: i'm preparing a new version of my panel with the help of Gaucho_59, who is a friend of mine and also a good artist, so i can upload a new version that will include modifies both to the bitmap and to the gauges, i will use your suggestions.
2) to Jinx: i must say that is the first panel entirely made by me so i have still much to learn, but i'm hoping, in the future, to considerably improve my techniques.
Bye,
Gius
watchdog22
Piston Broke
Very, very nice!
gaucho_59
Charter Member
Very nice... very nice...
There is net improvement! Bravo!!!
Nonostante ... (e te lo dico in italiano cosi rimane tra di noi) Ci sono ancora dei problemini caro Gius...
quella manovela di selezione serbatoi di carburante... sembra sospesa in aria...
a cosa e attacata... secondo me, ci starebbe meglio sopra il panello... ed essatamente quello che ho
sottolineato in quest'ultima edizione del tutorial.... con un attimino di dettagli tipo drop-shadow... ect.
In ogni modo... mi congratulo...
There is net improvement! Bravo!!!
Nonostante ... (e te lo dico in italiano cosi rimane tra di noi) Ci sono ancora dei problemini caro Gius...
quella manovela di selezione serbatoi di carburante... sembra sospesa in aria...
a cosa e attacata... secondo me, ci starebbe meglio sopra il panello... ed essatamente quello che ho
sottolineato in quest'ultima edizione del tutorial.... con un attimino di dettagli tipo drop-shadow... ect.
In ogni modo... mi congratulo...
gius
Charter Member
There is net improvement! Bravo!!!
Nonostante ... (e te lo dico in italiano cosi rimane tra di noi) Ci sono ancora dei problemini caro Gius...
quella manovela di selezione serbatoi di carburante... sembra sospesa in aria...
a cosa e attacata... secondo me, ci starebbe meglio sopra il panello... ed essatamente quello che ho
sottolineato in quest'ultima edizione del tutorial.... con un attimino di dettagli tipo drop-shadow... ect.
In ogni modo... mi congratulo...
Grazie Carlos,
ma il selettore è esattamente lì, non sul pannello, ho visto le fotografie, per il drop shadow vedrò, ma mi sembra che non sia necessario, dato che ho già provveduto a disegnare i cerchi in colore chiaro attorno agli alloggiamenti degli strumenti. Comunque ti ringrazio molto per il commento e gli apprezzamenti, li tengo molto in considerazione, ho ancora moltiiiiissimo da imparare da te!!!!
Abbracci,
Giuseppe