Sorry for the delay, but I had some digging to do.
First, as most of the arguments of the "it is BS" faction are centered around the
AIRFOIL article (Airfoil No.2, Spring 1984, pages 30-31), I had to find and read it first, which I did.
It is not without surprise that I discovered that Steve Blake and S.W. Sheflin, the co-authors of that piece, never communicated with the main character involved in it; Carr himself! As a former prosecution lawyer, I would never come to a conclusion without listening or reading all testimonies. Likewise, a journalist should always refrain from publishing something controversial unless he can say that the main characters involved have been reached to comment before publication. Their reasons for not doing so are:
"We want to make it very clear however, that we are not suggesting that Bruce Carr has ever had anything to do with fostering any of the more creative versions of this story. Mr. Carr is a very private person who would never stoop to making up such a nonsense."
Bruce W. Carr, a retired Colonel, was still well alive and kicking in 1984 and was not living as an hermit under a rock. A few months before his death in 1998, he was still flying a real two-seats P-51D christened
"Angels' Playmate" in his honor. He would go to pilots' reunions, and talk to anyone who wanted to talk to him. Short of being able to talk to Carr (I'm a former lawyer, not a former psychic...), I went for the next best thing; I emailed Sir Ernie Hamilton Boyette, a well-known artist specialized in aviation paintings who had received command of a painting From Lee Lauderback (a.k.a
Mister Mustang) with a profile of the P-51D "Angels' Playmate",
FT I, #44-63497. Here is an excerpt of his answer to my query:
"Bruce told the story that I wrote but there were some holes in his story since I only got to talk to him once.
The next form of interview was through Lee and his friends. Carr had been hospitalized.
Lee and his friends where visiting Carr ever day.
They got some questions answered for me plus they got Carr to approve the story for the print.
I was to publish his print in two days, but before the print was released, Carr passed away."
So, literally on his dying bed, Carr was
still standing behind his story. But what story was he standing by? Here is what Blake and Sheflin pretended to "debunk";
"The story has been told in several versions, but most contend that late in April, Carr was shot down somewhere in Austria. After hiding from enemy troops who were searching for him, he started walking toward neutral Switzerland and safety. He would hide during the day and travel cautiously during the night. In one telling of the story, the starving Carr is described as killing and eating a chicken raw., fearing the fire and smell of cooking would draw attention. One night he heard aircraft sounds, and snuck up on a Luftwaffe base loaded with aircraft. After much deliberation, the desperate Carr hit upon the idea of stealing a plane and flying it to freedom. After carefully timing the passings of the one guard (this is wartime, you know!), he snuck onto the field and into the closest plane. After quickly looking over the foreign instrument panel, Carr figured out how to start the plane and did so. After hauling this strange fighter into the air, he determined the correct heading home (in the dark, in a strange plane yet). Arriving over his Group's base at Ansbach, Carr then couldn't get the landing gear down and was forced to belly land the craft."
I understand that the "several versions" they're referring to were paper versions. Internet was still in its infancy in 1984. But it is rather strange to see that the "debunked version" never made it to the web! I have perused through a dozen or so versions on Internet,
none is placing the events in April or May 1945,
none is placing the 354th FG base at Ansbach, and
none is saying that the snatched Fw 190 was at Linz. Don't take my word for it, do your own search.
The story approved by Carr and written by Sir Ernie Hamilton Boyette, that you can find
HERE , places the events around November 2, 1944. The 354th base was, at the time, at Orconte (A-66) in France, as duly noted. The Luftwaffe airbase was in Czechoslovakia. Other sources are situating that base near Pilsen.
When it comes to the absence of reports, be reminded that absence of evidence is no evidence. If Carr was back within 48 hours, chances are a MACR form was never filled. As for the fate of the aircraft itself, not all were accounted for, far from it. For example, Blake and Sheflin article stated that;
"In addition, the 9th A.F. loss records, nor any other reference source, list Bruce Carr as being shot down during this period of the war, nor do they list any serial numbers of planes he is known to have flown." (underscore is mine)
Well, Carr
did bailed out due to engine failure from a P-51B (serial #43-6930) while with the 380th FS, 363rd FG, 9th AF, and I think it is fair to assume that this a/c was lost (reported as a "5") (
HERE); Carr had two assigned P-51D in rapid succession in 1945, #44-13693 and #44-63497, but I never found any reports concerning the fate of the first one. So much for paper trails.
So, are the events described in the AIRFOIL article bogus? Certainly not! But how does Carr "shopping excursion" near VE-Day is evidence that he did not steal another Fw 190 in late October - early November of the preceding year?
As for Col. Felix Kozaczka (Ret.) witnessing the last episode, I don't doubt it. But when he transferred in August 1944 from the 382nd FS, 363rd FG, he was assigned to the 356th FS. He never was Carr's wingmen, as Sheflin stated in a 2004 vehement post. As for being a "wingmate", the expression used in the more tamed Airfoil piece, I will let the readers decide.
"Red 31" was not the only Fw 190 to be brought on a 354th FG base (see
HERE). Curiously enough, "red 31" and "red 5" appeared to have been coming from the same outfit... based at Pilsen in November 1944.
Now, how much does the November '44 story makes sense? On October 29 1944, Carr obtained two victories plus one probable in an P-51D marked
FT PI (or Greek "
pi" sign?), serial unknown. See
HERE. Normally, planes of the 353rd FS were identified by the prefix
buzz ID "
FT" followed by one Roman letter for the individual a/c . So why "
PI"? This is not a typo as at least another pilot, Edward Earl Hunt, scored a "damaged" with the same P-51D on October 21 1944 (
HERE). Unfortunately, he would die on November 8 1944, but not while flying
FT PI. He was flying
FT U "Ready Eddy" (presumably his assigned a/c) (see
HERE). As for MACR, there is one... under the name Hunt,
Richard (?) E. Again, so much for paper trails.
Carr was to score his next kill in
FT L, Lt. Col. Glenn T. Eagleston P-51D
"Feeble Eagle" (44-63607), on March 9 1945, while waiting for "his" own P-51D.
What happened during this 132 days lull? Actually a lot; Carr was send for a 30 days R&R stateside on mid November, as reported in his story, and as confirmed by Steve Blake himself (
The Pioneer Mustang Group:the 354th Fighter Group in World War II, by Steve Blake, Schiffer, page 269). As he was leaving, the entire group was abandoning reluctantly their beloved Mustangs for P-47 "Jugs". Since Carr claims that his March 9 1945 victory was on his first return mission, it is fair to assume that he never flew a P-47. at least in anger, of the entire war.
FT PI was probably a "go to" or "mule" aircraft for pilots in need of a mount while their assigned bird was unavailable. After October 29 1944, this plane left no traces whatsoever. Not to be mistaken with Cary W. Salter
"Charlotte's Chariot II" FT "pi", serial #44-63747, (see
HERE) that he received after the 354th had returned to P-51s in February 1945. The serial would suggest that this plane came out of the assembly line around the same time as Carr's last P-51. Someone that seems very knowledgeable on the matter gives March 1945 for its arrival at the 354th FG (
HERE).
That the paperwork of the 354th would not mentioned the loss of the first
FT PI is far from being unconceivable; the group was fighting a war while changing its whole airplane inventory twice in three months! A "mule" lost as it was to be transferred to a second-line unit may well have fell between the cracks. Another fact playing against a form 14 accident report is that they were reserved usually for non-combat related events.
To conclude, among the stories reporting the events as true, we must consider Col. John L. Frisbee USAF (ret.), former editor of Air Force magazine, who wrote in February 1995, this article
HERE. for the "Valor" series published in this same magazine. As a military, editor, journalist and historian of the American Air Forces, his credentials are without reproach. Apart from the date, which he places in October '44, and other details, his article follows Carr's recollection to Sir Boyette.
It will take more than a half-done piece of journalism and the absence of a paper trail to convince me that the words of a dying war hero are worth nothing.