• Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

"Project Fokker" F28 for FSX ....

R

rcbarend

Charter Member
Hi,

Is there any interrest here in me uploading the "Project Fokker F28" for FSX ?

Since I was part of the orginal development team, I still like this freeware FS9 aircraft very much.
Very nice to fly, a lot of emulated systems and a very good visual model.
Allthough it lacked a VC, quite some systems were emulated "3D" in "2D" windows.

So what I did:
- Replaced all incompatible gauges with FSX-compatible ones.
- Adapted the main 2D panel for widescreen monitors.
- Tweaked some system gauges to FSX (like my fully automated Autoland system, which even works at 25 Knots crosswind).

Still no VC though, to avoid disappointment.

Rob
 
I would be very appreciative if you would do so, my FS9 flights were cut short as the original F28 turned feral and I gave up.
VC or no VC, she was very good at times!
:triumphant:
 
Rob, to have that "old sweetie" in FSX is simply a "Must have" for me - fly her so often in the good old FS9-Days. She was superbly done.

Kindest regards

Dirk
 
Hi Rob,

Yes please...........but you would not be helping my efforts to slim down my hangars....:encouragement:

best regards

Rick Canham
Australia
 
OK, enough interrest :sentimental:

Will probably be uploaded in a week or so, since I need to sort everything out for a simpel zip file (it won't come with an Installer, but all stuff will be in one single aircraft folder).
See attached pictures.

Rob

PS:
@Bjoern: as far as I know the .mdl source files were lost a long time ago.
But if you explain what/why, I can try to contact Ton van der Laar to check if he can still dig them up somewhere.
 

Attachments

  • F28-Exterior.jpg
    F28-Exterior.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 3
  • F28-MainPanel.jpg
    F28-MainPanel.jpg
    108.4 KB · Views: 8
rcbarend said:
@Bjoern: as far as I know the .mdl source files were lost a long time ago.
But if you explain what/why, I can try to contact Ton van der Laar to check if he can still dig them up somewhere.
Click to expand...

Well, I actually had a FSX native conversion and maybe building a VC in mind, but looking at the operators list on Wikipedia, there were only three or four operators in the USA. And the panel looks like it needs even more work to create some original gauges that work in FSX.
 
Does the small number of US operators keep you from creating a VC?

By the way, I think it is not too difficult to code the VC, based on 2D gauges. Can this be true?
 
Dutcheeseblend said:
Does the small number of US operators keep you from creating a VC?
Click to expand...

The uncertain status of the source files plays a role as well, but yes, little use for one in my 1980s environment unless I expand operations (and AFX files) further north where the F28 was more popular.

By the way, I think it is not too difficult to code the VC, based on 2D gauges. Can this be true?
Click to expand...

Panel polygons can be equipped with a $panel.bmp "texture" which allows placing 2D gauges on them by defining their position and size in the [VCockpit] sections of the panel.cfg.
This used to be a the standard for making VC panels and is still the best way to do gauges in more complex airplanes.
(Does the Blender exporter support $panel textures, by the way?)


The unavailablity of some of the original gauges or the source files isn't the main issue itself rather than the additional work required by their restoration. And since work equals time and since time is awfully limited...

Anyway, if the gauge files can be opened in FSPanelStudio, one can at least salvage the gauge's bitmaps, which only leaves the gauge logic (in XML) to be done. Provided, of course, that there isn't any stringent dependancy on the still functional C++ gauges of the panel...
The model itself can be opened in ModelConverterX and saved in .OBJ format. It will break all the smoothing, animations and part names, but at least the UV maps of each part will be retained.
 
Ah, I see! Yes, a $panel does work fine in the Blender toolset. In fact, I HAD to use one because of some sound gauge problems. I was only using xml coding and tag objects, but that didn't work at some point. Creating a simple 2D xml gauge and applying the corresponding $ to a plane in my cockpit solved the problems. I believe in fact rcbarend was the one who was advicing the use of a 2D gauge. So: works fine :D

What I was thinking: VC gauges, switches and stuff can be coded in the modeldef with Lvars that refer to the 2D gauges of the 2D panel. But I might be thinking to simplistic...
Creating a F28 VC sounds like a challenge to me, to be honest. But there's more, there's also a D.21 (almost there), a T.5 and that one will be difficult (for the internal part). So for now, only the old LVA Fokkers :D :jump:
 
IMO, creating a proper VC (with the functionality of the main, overhead en throttle 2D panels) by today's quality standards would be a hell of a job.
Also, many of the gauges that were created specifically for this F28, are XML gauges that use very simple 2D bitmaps.

But if anyone finds this a worthwhile challenge: be my guest :encouragement:

Rob
 
Dutcheeseblend said:
What I was thinking: VC gauges, switches and stuff can be coded in the modeldef with Lvars that refer to the 2D gauges of the 2D panel. But I might be thinking to simplistic...
Creating a F28 VC sounds like a challenge to me, to be honest. But there's more, there's also a D.21 (almost there), a T.5 and that one will be difficult (for the internal part). So for now, only the old LVA Fokkers :D :jump:
Click to expand...

Well, the next airplsane on my list would be a VC for the DC-9 series, but I want to get comfy with Blender first.

So after you and I are done with the other stuff, we can join up with Rob and tackle any new F-28.
 
Bjoern said:
Well, the next airplsane on my list would be a VC for the DC-9 series, but I want to get comfy with Blender first.

So after you and I are done with the other stuff, we can join up with Rob and tackle any new F-28.
Click to expand...

Good idea! In a year or 5 or so... ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top