• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

SAMM Conundrum

falcon409

falcon409

SOH-CM-2025
Is there a way to get SAMM to produce a single static object "bgl" and corresponding textures without the ridiculous subfolders being involved? At one time I produced 5 statics for my North Texas Regional Airport and all I have in that scenery are the bgl's for the aircraft and the corresponding textures in the texture folder.

Now it seems SAMM wants to add subfolders with the aircraft name that include the original textures then an additional folder with the aircraft name plus "%", plus ";ALL".

I tried loading the mdl file that SAMM produces into MCX and working with the textures that I placed in the main texture folder, recompile the airplane to call those textures and not the odd setup that SAMM seems to be so fond of. Still doesn't work, when I try to use the static object in IS3 it's black. This happens whether I'm in FSX or P3D.

There's gotta be a way to simplify this so that you end up with a scenery object (the static aircraft) and the textures (in the texture folder).:dizzy::banghead:
 
Ed, I do exactly what you describe in MCX and it works fine for me using ADE or SBX for placement.
 
Dimus said:
Ed, I do exactly what you describe in MCX and it works fine for me using ADE or SBX for placement.
Click to expand...
Dimus, I went back and tried it again and this time it worked. . .no idea why it gave me problems before. I have come to several conclusions though;
1) If you intend to do more than one or two for a particular scenery then individual sub-folders would be necessary (it eliminates the chance of duplicate texture names over multiple aircraft).
2) Don't use complex aircraft, especially those for FSX or P3D where bumps and specs are involved. You can omit them but the aircraft isn't usable and with them you increase the number of textures needed just to display a static aircraft
3) Don't have transparent glass. Opaque looks odd, but it keeps you from having to include all the interior textures, or at least those that are visible as you taxi by or park next to the static airplane.
 
Agree about the glass Ed. I usually assign a silvery color and increase the reflection scale in MCX. Many models also have a pilot figure and it looks odd for a static so opaque glass hides that. Finally, I always change the object name and GUI before compiling to bgl, especially if I want to make different liveries of the same plane.
 
Hi,

falcon409 said:
3) Don't have transparent glass. Opaque looks odd, but it keeps you from having to include all the interior textures, or at least those that are visible as you taxi by or park next to the static airplane.
Click to expand...

With MCX/material editor and selecting canopy texture file, did you try the option "Set default transparent" ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top