Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

who Created the 229 for fsx?![]()
Roger
This is a quick and dirty fix , I have not yet fully evaluated it,
**********
In the " aircraft cfg " copy and paste the following static thrust line in and save.
[TurbineEngineData]
static_thrust=3493.000000 //static_thrust=2693.000000
**************
I changed it from 2,693 to 3493.
I suspect that the 3493 value might be a little on the high side,
however I cannot be sure until I put in more advanced instrumentation to properly evaluate it.
Give it a try , it really boosts the performance characteristics.
Quick and dirty tests resulted in the following determined by the small red text at top left of screen.
=> it climbed to 50,000' and was still climbing.
-overspeed light was on.
- no stall warning indication at that Alt.
=> max speed in very steep dive reached 780 KIAS ( probably too high , it would have been supersonic )
Cheers
Karol
I'd second the cynicism over actual Ho229 performance: few aircraft have been so sexed up in recent years and on the flimsiest of data. A video of B2s landing in the UK brought home how potentially unstable the flying wing could be and they have untold rafts of stability electronics to keep the airframe under control.
The only problem is the fuel tank system, and this must be an error in the way its coded, but after burning up about 20% of the fuel, the airplane is imbalanced because of the way the fuel flows from the 2 tanks, and it banks to the left out of control at low speed, and I have found no way to crossfeed the tanks or somehow correct this issue. I emailed the developers about it and they couldn't do anything because they apparently aren't together anymore. Anyone else have this problem with this airplane?