-
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Sukhoi T-50 loses engine/aborts takeoff @ MAKS
- Thread starter deathfromafar
- Start date
CWOJackson
Charter Member
Given events in the past few days at airshows, glad he aborted.
deathfromafar
Charter Member
I've never been one to doubt Russian Engineering. Cut corners here and there they may but they do get the job done and more often than not, they turn good stuff out. What they have accomplished with designing and building the T-50 is significant even if it does borrow on our designs somewhat. As one of our members here correctly pointed out, there's only so many ways you can achieve stealth and certain performance parameters within a given design. What Sukhoi is running into now is that they now realize the elevated challenges of building such an aircraft and the current limitations of their engineering and available materials and technology. The final engine is still a ways off as continuing technical issues are slowing progress of that. There are still numerous other issues currently and ahead that could push the production start and service entry nearly 10 years or more away. It's not unlike the challenges and delays we faced with the F-22 and now F-35 but I am confident that eventually they will get it right. Some sources say if they rush the T-50 into production, it will end up more a Gen 4.5 than a Gen 5 Fighter. One piece of advice I've read, ditch thrust vectoring on the plane and focus on stealth, radar/sensor systems and weapons that have an engagement and maneuver envelope far beyond what any manned or unmanned aircraft can evade.
It is a Stealth Aircraft how did they see it? It must be broke....
@deathfromafar
Stealth requires that they all look the same. If we are going by looks it closer to the YF-23. As for if the T-50 Tank... Eh Airplane is a Gen 4.5 or a Gen 5 may not matter soon. If the US Congress cans the F-35 to save on the buget in a year. Every agreed on Gen 5 Fighter will have failed to make front line serves render all agreed on Gen 5 Fighter nothing more than mass made experimetal aircraft and ALL Gen 4.5 will become Gen 5 Fighters.
@deathfromafar
Stealth requires that they all look the same. If we are going by looks it closer to the YF-23. As for if the T-50 Tank... Eh Airplane is a Gen 4.5 or a Gen 5 may not matter soon. If the US Congress cans the F-35 to save on the buget in a year. Every agreed on Gen 5 Fighter will have failed to make front line serves render all agreed on Gen 5 Fighter nothing more than mass made experimetal aircraft and ALL Gen 4.5 will become Gen 5 Fighters.