• There seems to be an up tick in Political commentary in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site we know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religiours commentary out of the fourms.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politicion will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment amoung members. It is a poison to the community. We apprciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

The L-1649 has is getting a new glass cockpit

Tragic... forcing a classic aircraft to have a glass cockpit to carry passengers... next it will need emergency slides and TVs for certification. *sigh*
 
Nothing tragic about it Firekitten, I see it as just a progressive step in it's direction towards it's certification to carry passengers commercially like any other modern airliner. It makes sense after I read the article. It will look great with that new glass cockpit.
 
The fact that she will be able to do again what she was designed to do is what really matters. Sure it would be nice to see her in the original state, but remember too that she had a lot of changes since the original concept plane. I applaud Lufthansa for taking on this challenge and putting her back in the air where she belongs. We have enough static displays around, we need more that do the job set out for them. I have over two thousand hours flying in r7v's and wv-2's and I have to say, I never got tired of it. Loved those 13 14 hour flights on the Pacific barrier.
 
Firekitten said:
Tragic... forcing a classic aircraft to have a glass cockpit to carry passengers... next it will need emergency slides and TVs for certification. *sigh*
Click to expand...

Well, if all of those things are needed for safety (except the TV's of course) then that would be the sensible thing to do. I agree that vintage/classic planes should be preserved, but if and when they are used to transport people on a regular commercial basis, then safety comes first.

In the light of recent events this seems to be obvious to me. Imagine that plane venturing into North Korean airspace unknowingly...

Just my two €cents worth of course...

Dumonceau
 
We already know what would happen over north korea, one of ours did in '69 no warning shot out of the sky by two north korean jets. My they were brave shooting down an unarmed wv-2. Of course we did retaliate, NOT.
 
dharris said:
We already know what would happen over north korea, one of ours did in '69 no warning shot out of the sky by two north korean jets. My they were brave shooting down an unarmed wv-2. Of course we did retaliate, NOT.
Click to expand...

The differnce being that a WV-2 is a military plane, and L-1649 is a civvie plane... The WV-2 had no business in Korean airspace and the Koreans had every right to shoot it down. Officially they were and still are at war. The bottom line is that military planes are legitimate targets. Civvie planes are not. Like the iranian airliner shot down by the US over the Gulf was not a legitimate target.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

Dumonceau
 
She was not in korean airspace, I flew these missions on several occasions, we never strayed close to their airspace because of their insane reactions. Flew as electronics tech aboard wv-2's for years, we knew what and where to be at all times. We flew up and down the korean coast never getting close to their airspace.
 
That glass makes it so much safer to operate. The ones in museums should show how it was. The ones flying for revenue should be as safe as possible. This will do just that. I can't wait to see her when finished. I grew up crawling around in / on these things. Beautiful plane.

Don
 
I like see modern with classic style on planes... thinking at the Basler BT-67....

Then by all the upgrades we make at Military aircrafts you think they don't are to do?:D

Safety first-style then:thumbup:
 
Wouldn't a retrofitted GPS/FMC system, VBE altimeter and TCAS be enough for the certification? As this is how several old Soviet built aircraft are still operating today. Not to mention all the old Boeings operating in Iran.

Would be wiser to just fit the necessary RNAV instrumentation and leave everything else as it is, as I doubt this will be safer as the L-1649 was not built to be a glass cockpit airliner.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top