The Mystery Auster

RyDraiggoch

Charter Member
Due for release tomorow at www.britsim.com for Fs9 Nominally



Dave Molyneaux, Brian Horsey and Martin P give you the A2/45 M/N type Auster the bastard offspring of an AOP6 and a Fiesler Storch

Pick it up tomorrow -- its interesting to fly , (The real Auster test pilots described its flight
charachterisitics as "A Squid swimming in Vodka"


Leif
 
The General Service Requirement for the ideal Air O.P. aircraft to succeed the Auster 6 was written by condensing wartime know-how into the A2/45 specifications. Three manufacturers – Auster, Hestons and Miles, built widely different prototypes in attempts to improve the performance of the Auster 6 – they all failed.


The specification called for an aeroplane that could clear an 50ft obstacle in 200 yards from a standing start, with full load and armour. The service ceiling required was 11000 feet. It also had to have armour proof against .303 ammunition at 200 yards below and behind the pilot as well as the engine.


It was also required that the aircraft could be dismantled within 30 minutes by the pilot and four soldiers into small enough components to enable its transportation on an Army three ton truck.
The first Auster design, the Model M, was originally modelled around the 160hp Gipsy Major engine. But as the specification made many changes to the build, it became a far larger aircraft with a Gipsy Queen 34 of 240hp, thus becoming the Model N.


Two Auster A2/45s were built at Rearsby; the first VL522 making its first flight on April 28 1948. Towards the end of 1948 Ranald Porteous, who had just joined the company and who was later to become the Chief Test Pilot, made a short solo flight in the aircraft. He was not very impressed with it. Asked to recall the A2/45’s handling characteristics he had this to say:
The A2/45 was a most uninspiring aircraft to fly. The controls were heavy, soggy and ill-harmonised, the ailerons particularly unresponsive and caused much adverse yaw. The Auster’s take off performance was quite brisk, although as I recall not quite short as the requirement.


When the trials commenced nothing was seen of the Miles product at Middle Wallop (it remained a paper project), where in May and June 1949 trials of the Heston (a low wing, twin boom pusher monoplane) had proved that this otherwise delightful little aircraft had a totally inadequate take-off performance. Two Auster A2/45s were delivered to Middle Wallop in June 1950. In the meantime, the home of Army Aviation had changed its name from 227 (Air O.P.) O.C.U. to the Air O.P. School.
Trials quickly showed that Auster’s contender for the A2/45 specifications had some very pecuilar habits. It was a tandem seater in which the rear observer faced aft. The overall silhouette was a distinct breakaway from the traditional Auster and owed a lot, to the wartime Fi.156 Storch.


Apart from a 300 yard take-off, the flap handling was most odd. Outsized flaps were wound down by a handwheel at the pilot’s left hand. These flaps, when down, produced a very high drag coupled with a strong downwash on the tailplane.


These combined affects brought the aircraft’s nose up sharply as flap was applied and during the subsequent approach to land, the stick had to be held fully forward against the instrument panel. A three point landing was made by releasing the forward pressure on the stick. The climax of the trials came when, with a rear observer providing maximum aft C of G, the luckless pilot found that a flapped landing was impossible and in the attempt neatly removed the starboard undercarriage leg.


During subsequent investigation it was disclosed that Boscombe Down had forgotten to tell anyone that they considered the aircraft unsafe in this configuration. None of the A2/45 series were accepted.


In September 1948 VL522 appeared at the SBAC Show at Farnborough. Its performance was disappointing for, after taking off in company with the Auster Avis, it returned to land and was not seen again.


The second prototype VL523 was flown a year later than the first and by December 1949 was undergoing preliminary trials at Rearsby, Leicestershire. Both aircraft were still at Rearsby in April 1950, neither the Heston or the Auster A2/45 being ordered into production. A month later both airframes were flown down to Middle Wallop, where they were soon allocated to Maintenance Command. Whatever happened to VL522 we don’t know, but VL523 was seen in a scrapyard in Liverpool in 1957.


This project couldn’t have created without the wonderful help from Peter Stoddart of the Leicester Council Records Office (who hold all of the Auster archives – nearly all documents for the A2/45 were quickly destroyed when the project was cancelled) who helped with reference material and Mike Preston of the Auster Heritage Group. Without their assistance, this model would have extremely hard to create and I must say that myself, Dave and Brian have to have seen all that there is on this forgotten aeroplane as to tell the truth not much exists. What does exist has made us create a realistic replica of Auster’s White Elephant.


One thing for sure, is that the instrument panel is rather unique to the flight sim world as it incorporates the test gauges that were used during the preliminary trials of the project – I don’t this has been seen before. And a word of advice, please, please read the readme files before you take to the skies, they contain vital information, that even myself after some 50 hours of testing failed to notice upon a later flight. My actions (or lack of them) to say the least were rather embarrassing!


If it had lived up to it s expectations than it has said that she would have been the Westland Lysander all over again. It’s a wonderful aeroplane to fly and will give the Storch a run for its money. I’ve tested various models over the last few weeks and am always looking for somewhere small to put her down into and 9/10 have succeeded. She’s a lot different than the other major Auster models and a delight to fly, so I hope you enjoy flying her as much as we the creators and the beta team have done in producing her for you.
Best wishes,

Martin
 
She's an intriguing looking aircraft, thanks for recreating her! I'll go and find the download now...
 
Short field performance is superb, but she is sluggish in terms of handling. Spent about an hour flying it today, the control lock is a nice touch to the realism .... I actually think it is a very good looking aircraft .... Thanks again for this, yet another Auster ! Mike :ernae::england:
 
Short field performance is superb, but she is sluggish in terms of handling. Spent about an hour flying it today, the control lock is a nice touch to the realism .... I actually think it is a very good looking aircraft .... Thanks again for this, yet another Auster ! Mike :ernae::england:

Cheers for that!! Sluggish might be an apt description, but if you have read the above, then we have tried to re-create what the type was like in real life, akin to what we know. I think I've learnt a lot with this Auster and over a few hours, have gained a likeness for the type - inlcluding its quirks. For me, she shall sit at the front of my 'virtual' hangar. Biased? Me of course not!!!

Best wishes,

Martin
 
Dropped downloads

If you can't complete the download before one of the various servers along the route drops out, you'll get that corrupted file message :(
However, if you post a message over at BritSim.com, I'll put up a link to the fileset on Sendspace which normally works O.K. Not much good posting the problem here as I don't check here very often.
Cheers
Dave M(oly)
 
Gawd, just when my download HD reaches capacity, must remember to burn some more discs!! Guess I'll stick it on another HD in the meantime, I tend to get myself all FUBAR doing that, but it looks VERY worth it.

Jamie
 
I finally had a few minutes to devote to exploring this new Auster this evening. If anyone has not yet downloaded it I would heartily recommend it. It's a great model with an interesting flight model - it's more STOL than anything else I've ever tried!
 
I finally had a few minutes to devote to exploring this new Auster this evening. If anyone has not yet downloaded it I would heartily recommend it. It's a great model with an interesting flight model - it's more STOL than anything else I've ever tried!

It is a hoot to fly....though apparently just like the real thing not something you just pick up and get right on the first attempt. Many thanks to the team for creating this beauty.

You might want to try Piglets Fi-156 though....it's even more STOL. Just like the real thing.

Stefan
 
Stefan

Good observation - As Martin has said, and I put on the front page of the Pond, the A2/45 was
the offspring of a Storch and an AOP6 -- Apparently a Fi156 lived at the Auster plant for several years after the war, and if you look at the tail group and struts and Undercarriage you can see where the design group at Austers used the Fi156 as a template. Frankly I am glad that in the end they stuck with what they knew and the AOP9 happened along.

Leif
 
Understood Leif. One of the best features of FS, provided that we get to work with reasonably realistic FDs, is that we can compare real airplanes that we otherwise never get to lay hands on. I have seen Fi-156 types fly on a number of occasions but never the Auster AOPs.

Getting to fly them in FS is a fun way to get a bit closer to these historic flying machines. I definitely appreciate the choice to go with a FD that does approximate the real airplanes character even if it may be off-putting to the casual sim-pilot who is dismayed when not everything is as easy to handle as the C-172.

Stefan
 
Getting to fly them in FS is a fun way to get a bit closer to these historic flying machines. I definitely appreciate the choice to go with a FD that does approximate the real airplanes character even if it may be off-putting to the casual sim-pilot who is dismayed when not everything is as easy to handle as the C-172.

Stefan

Thanks for your kind remarks - very much appreciated. I have to say, that with all of the current airworthy Austers modelled by us, we have always tried to create flight models that replicate (within the confines of the simulator program) the real thing. Armed with the Pilots Notes and feedback and input from owners and pilots, Brian Horsey has worked wonders with all of the Austers. I recently demonstrated a few of them to my Auster - but not sim - flying friends and all admired what we have tried to replicate. You can't have better praise than that.

The program is meant to be a simulator and thats what we have always intended to try and mirror. It may not be everyone's cup of tea, but I would like to better my sim flying on something that resembled the real thing, than a flight model to suit all.

Best wishes,

Martin
 
A2/45 - A Curious fact

Good to read all the comments folks - makes the build all the more worthwhile :) .
Although very little information and even fewer photos now exist for this oddity, a few facts are worth noting -it had to have bullet-proofing below & behind the pilot (what about the poor observer ?) , and be capable of being dismantled within 30 mins and carried on a 3 ton army truck. The pilots seat was stressed to 25 g :icon_eek: -so don't worry about any hard landings ! :)
Cheers
Dave M(oly)
 
Back
Top