Reporter?? the source is NASA
There's no attempt, that I can see, to do anything other than provide information on the known/pending disposition of a rather significant piece of space hardware that is likely NOT going to be totally immolated on reentry. In fact, the information is publicized because "the public has a right to know" as every lawyer will proclaim if a hot piece of debris gets parked in some lame-brain's driveway and he gets burned trying to spirit it away so he can sell it on E-Bay.
The 1-in-3200 human risk estimate is not some newsroom guess, but is contained in the NASA Re-Entry and Risk Assessment Document (.pdf) linked on the NASA website above. As for it being un-newsworthy, it may be (and likely will not make it into most local papers until afterward) but the re-entry of any large object does interest a lot of people who have followed space programs, as well as probably some of those who may get to see a potentially spectacular fireball if conditions are right.
Of course, if it doesn't impact a major downtown area in the US odds are slim that CNN will even mention it.
Easy there, Boss.
Fact is, the news media has been
over-hyping this re-entry event for the past few days. Lucky for you, you must have missed it.
If you had seen the coverage, then you would have clearly understood the context of my comment made, Sir. :salute:
Obviously, SpitXIV already understands, he's seen enough of the silliness as well.
Here's some other facts.
The Coulmbia disaster, God rest their souls, was a much larger object that re-entered, broke up over a populated area, and resulted in no casualties on the ground.
Experts have also commented even with the 1-3200 number (which is the standard risk number NASA has used for years), you have a better chance at getting hit from lightning, or a part falling off a plane, than from a small piece of this satellite.
It still has a greater chance of hitting an ocean than land.
Oh, and if a flaming hot piece does fall in your driveway, it's officially US government property, and can't be sold on eBay. Sorry!

(Dunno how that would work in Canada tho)
EDIT: Knew I read this somewhere. BTW the 1-3200? That translates into a roughly 1-in-20 trillion chance for any particular person.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44595042/ns/technology_and_science-space/#.TnmVatQQ4-c