Daiwilletti
Charter Member
Recently I had the time to sit down and install some of the new aircraft into my MAW theatre. SJ_ prefixed Fulmar, Spitfires and Typhoon.
The amount of work taken on amazing details really raises the bar with these aircraft. Seeing all the work put in on Fxtextures, sound file entries, effects xml entries, not to mention the excellence in modelling and skinning made me truly appreciate these contributions.
Whilst adding lines for the effects.xml for the spitfires and the Typhoons, I noticed that many tracer effects had the typo "Roration" instead of "Rotation". IIRC the typos are part of the current effects xml, not the added lines for the aircraft.
I did a "find and replace", with "rotation" replacing "roration" wherever the words appeared in the effects.xml. And the result was? Nothing different that I can discern. In some ways that is a good thing, as it means that the effects.xml does not lock up. Does anyone have a suggestion as to whether doing a general correction of "Roration" is a good idea?
The amount of work taken on amazing details really raises the bar with these aircraft. Seeing all the work put in on Fxtextures, sound file entries, effects xml entries, not to mention the excellence in modelling and skinning made me truly appreciate these contributions.
Whilst adding lines for the effects.xml for the spitfires and the Typhoons, I noticed that many tracer effects had the typo "Roration" instead of "Rotation". IIRC the typos are part of the current effects xml, not the added lines for the aircraft.
I did a "find and replace", with "rotation" replacing "roration" wherever the words appeared in the effects.xml. And the result was? Nothing different that I can discern. In some ways that is a good thing, as it means that the effects.xml does not lock up. Does anyone have a suggestion as to whether doing a general correction of "Roration" is a good idea?