UG-lee!

Wyld45

Charter Member
buffalo-01.jpg


Makes me think of the term, "Buffalo Woman". Might be fun to fly, but you dont want your friends to see you flying it!

History: Recognizing in 1936 that the day of the biplane flying off carrier decks was ending, the US Navy sent a proposal to manufacturers specifying a monoplane configuration, wing flaps, arrester gear, retractable landing flaps and an enclosed cockpit. Brewster’s design, the F2A, featured all-metal construction except for fabric control surfaces, a Wright Cyclone piston engine (allowing the plane to exceed 300 mph), four fixed machine guns and attachments for two 100 pound bombs. In June 1939 the first of 54 F2A-1 production planes was delivered, the first nine sent to equip VF-3 aboard USS Saratoga.
By late 1940 the Navy was receiving the F2A-2, an improved version with a more powerful engine, better propeller and built-in flotation gear. Unfortunately the plane was overweight and unstable, especially compared to the Japanese Zero, and would soon be replaced by the Grumman Wildcat.




About 200 land-based versions were bought by the British, who called it the Brewster Buffalo; they were sent to the Far East in an attempt to free up Spitfires and Hurricanes in Europe. Used in the defense of Burma and Singapore, the Buffalo was overmatched by the Japanese and eventually withdrawn from service. In fact, the only successful combat enjoyed in the Far East was the 100 Buffaloes of the Netherlands East Indies Army fitted with a larger (1,200 hp) Wright engine. Only by maintaining a high altitude and diving suddenly out of the sun were the Dutch able to defeat the Zero in Java and Malaya.
A significant user of the Buffalo was the Finnish Air Force. Though unloved by the British, Australians, Americans, Belgians and Kiwis, 44 Buffaloes were flown by the Finnish LLv24 Squadron, and the aircraft was beloved and found to be very effective in the hands of its Finnish pilots. No fewer than 12 pilots became aces in Buffaloes, and the aircraft is remembered fondly by many.
 
One of my favourite aeroplanes, ever since I got the then new Airfix kit in the mid-1970s. Admittedly not one of the most effective, but then very few American aircraft of the time were any good.

I think the Finns threw out most of the additional rubbish the USN had built into theirs, which explains partly why the Finnish version was a bit less hopeless. Rene will certainly tell us more!
 
I think the Finns threw out most of the additional rubbish the USN had built into theirs, which explains partly why the Finnish version was a bit less hopeless. Rene will certainly tell us more!

Yep. Here goes. Ours were B-239's - the back to basics export model - with no flotation bags, no arrester gear (or its attachment structures) of any kind, no (semi)retracting tailwheel, none of the fancy stuff found in the F2A series. They probably performed better with the 950 bhp engine than the F2A-3 with its 1200 bhp powerplant and were far more manoeuvrable thanks to being lighter. And most importantly the pilots were experienced after fighting in the Winter War, something the Americans weren't at that time. Several Soviet Hurricanes, Kittyhawks and even a couple of Spitfires, not to mention the countless LaGGs and others, fell to the guns of the Brewsters (the name Buffalo wasn't used here, they were just Brewsters) so it must have been quite a decent piece of equipment after all.

If we'll ever see a CFS3 version of the aircraft I'll provide the potential skinners with more info they'll ever need. This is a promise.
 
I believe the ideal fighter stuck in most of our heads is that sleek-aero design thats so well known. Most Americans think of the P-51 like the Brits think of the Spitfire.

I look at this thing here and I think of, "Cash-for-Clunkers".
 
Oh, and the one in the picture isn't an actual Brewster (the fuselage code should be BW- instead of HM-) but a VL Humu, an attempt to build a Finnish version mainly out of wood and powered by a captured M-63 engine. If the original Brewster wasn't quite the best fighter out there the Humu was just about the worst. Too little power, too much weight and a fuselage fuel tank that threw the centre of gravity out of the window. One built.
 
Back
Top