Because I've now got it down to a couple of hours per incredibly simple scenery (i.e. don't ask me to do Culdrose at this speed!), I sat down after getting back from an appointment yesterday and, in about two hours, knocked out a version of RAF Little Snoring. Yes, your first guess is the reason why. I've allocated it the fictional ICAO code of "EGZZ" for equally obvious reasons.
Anyway. Unfortunately, because UTX's development tool has picked up a number of the taxiways and remaining bits of runway as hardened road surfaces, these appear as roads as well as taxiways. Normally, they're hidden by the taxiways, but accesses to the old hangars that are now used for other purposes and new roads, etc, are visible over the airfield flatten and I haven't (yet) managed to work out how to exclude them. Therefore, I can't guarantee that a little notaFord Pickup or notaToyota saloon won't come careening down the taxiway towards you at an inopportune moment.
Does anyone care? Do many people even use UTX EU? Would anyone like to play with a silly (but accurately) named reproduction airfield for test purposes?
Ian P.
Anyway. Unfortunately, because UTX's development tool has picked up a number of the taxiways and remaining bits of runway as hardened road surfaces, these appear as roads as well as taxiways. Normally, they're hidden by the taxiways, but accesses to the old hangars that are now used for other purposes and new roads, etc, are visible over the airfield flatten and I haven't (yet) managed to work out how to exclude them. Therefore, I can't guarantee that a little notaFord Pickup or notaToyota saloon won't come careening down the taxiway towards you at an inopportune moment.
Does anyone care? Do many people even use UTX EU? Would anyone like to play with a silly (but accurately) named reproduction airfield for test purposes?
Ian P.