• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Yago - thanks for the goose..

Thank you..It,s too bad MS decided to use same piece of texture for both wings..Any markings or writtings are shown in reverse on one side..Very dumb decision on very well made model.

PC.jpg
 
And i just submitted a new FDE revision to Butch and the gang at OzX last night. It's gotten so detailed and tight that what i need now is the original engineering design equations. So when this thing is finally done, your gonna have a good plane to put those paints on.. I'll put my entire reputation or what there is of it, on the line behind that..
Pam
 
Oh, yes. Isn't she lovely! I used to maintain CF-HUZ and CF-IOL back in the Mac-Blo flight ops days, before Pacific coastal bought the aircraft. Immaculate airplanes, Each received a total tear-down and rebuild every 2 years, just because. I shuddder to think what they look like now. Ah,them was the days...
3/7charlie
 
Yep, I wanted to do some skins for default aircraft but they cut way too many corners to do a proper skin, sad really.
 
warchild said:
And i just submitted a new FDE revision to Butch and the gang at OzX last night. It's gotten so detailed and tight that what i need now is the original engineering design equations. So when this thing is finally done, your gonna have a good plane to put those paints on.. I'll put my entire reputation or what there is of it, on the line behind that..
Pam
Click to expand...

I'm sure it's going to be just fantastic! There are very few birds I've been as excited at getting my hands on as the OzX revamp of the Goose. Waiting with baited breath :running:

And Yago, the paint looks fantastic!
 
Thx guys, but it,s not fantastic..it,s ok..I wanted to help the model a bit since all the default ones are blurry for some reason.At least this one it,s not...Someone pointed out privately to me that it was a mistake doing a coast guard livery on a model with retractable floats.Microsoft made the same mistake with the Air Force livery but i bet he never e-mailed them to complain. Anyway I want to thank him for his vigilance and apologise for the distress I,ve caused him . I would like to promise him it wont happend again.I got upset at first but then I,ve realised he,s right .My bad..Only the correct version from now,it makes sense cause this thing upsets people more than I thought .I must recon I was pretty good at that.
 
yago9 said:
Someone pointed out privately to me that it was a mistake doing a coast guard livery on a model with retractable floats.Microsoft made the same mistake with the Air Force livery but i bet he never e-mailed them to complain. Anyway I want to thank him for his vigilance and apologise for the distress I,ve caused him with that. I would like to promise him it wont happend again.My bad.Only the correct version from now,it makes sense.
Click to expand...


Haha! Too funny:icon_lol::icon_lol::icon_lol:.

Default Goose is a plane with huge potential. I have great hopes for the OZx-crew to make it flyable:jump:
 
yago9 said:
Thx, but it,s not fantastic..it,s ok..I wanted to help the model a bit since all the default ones are blurry for some reason.At least this one it,s not...Someone pointed out privately to me that it was a mistake doing a coast guard livery on a model with retractable floats.Microsoft made the same mistake with the Air Force livery but i bet he never e-mailed them to complain. Anyway I want to thank him for his vigilance and apologise for the distress I,ve caused him with that. I would like to promise him it wont happend again.I got upset at first but then I,ve realised he,s right .My bad..Only the correct version from now,it makes sense cause this thing upsets people more than I thought .
Click to expand...

Well, at least it sounds like you were quite the gentleman about it, LOL! :ernae: You're avatar, LOL, someone needs to roll him back into the ocean.
 
:ernae: You're avatar, LOL, someone needs to roll him back into the ocean.[/QUOTE]

Yea..LOL ..I had to photoshop the private parts exposed, but the people at the beach that day, were not that lucky..
 
yago9 said:
:ernae: You're avatar, LOL, someone needs to roll him back into the ocean.
Click to expand...

Yea..LOL ..I had to photoshop the private parts exposed, but the people at the beach that day, were not that lucky..[/QUOTE]

Thank God for your editing skills then, LOL :applause:
 
US Coast Guard it,s in the library here at SOH..Pacific Coastal it,s not uploaded yet because of this problem..double registration..I can,t remove the US registration..If anybody knows how pls tell me .
..or I can remove the canadian one and wait for the complains to poor in..
 
Hi Yago,

I guess the easiest way to remove the registration is to delete the reg from the 'atc_id' line in the aircraft.cfg:

[fltsim.4]
title=Grumman Goose G21A paint5
sim=Grumman_Goose_G21A
model=""
panel=""
sound=""
texture=5
kb_checklists=GrummanGooseG21A_check
kb_reference=GrummanGooseG21A_ref
atc_id=
ui_manufacturer=Grumman
ui_type=Goose G21A
Click to expand...

The paint looks really good! :applause:

Greetings
Tim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top