-
There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Milviz 737-200 Combi
- Thread starter Aircanuck
- Start date
I thought that there was one when we developed this project? I'll have to look back through my stuff, but my memory on this is dim as I was mostly trying to make it fly by the numbers. The 200 was sort of a sports car of airliners, we went into all sorts of "interesting" places.
T
T
Skyhawk18
Charter Member
Well I don't think there were any CP Air livery. I was thinking of painting one (but I never finished that project).
Yes the planes that I flew had the gravel kit, which was first test flown by Wein Air Alaska at Fort Yukon.
The kit mostly consisted of a "nose ski" which damped down the gravel spray from the nose wheel and a probe in front of each nacelle which used bleed air for vortex dissipation.
T
The kit mostly consisted of a "nose ski" which damped down the gravel spray from the nose wheel and a probe in front of each nacelle which used bleed air for vortex dissipation.
T
warchild
Charter Member
warchild
Charter Member
I coukldnt imagine what flying that was like, but ive been on something similar to that emergency decent. The first time was when i was in the military and we were coming into portland at night. We had just topped Mt Hood when the pilot put us into a nose down dive. I think we all thought we were going to die.. the second time, we were over atlanta and we hit an air pocket. People, bags food and drinks all flew up in the air and we KNEW we were gonna die.. That was one very scary landing..
johndetrick
Charter Member
You would have been impressed by the DC-8 with the thrust reverse's out. If i remember correctly from a Douglas bulletin on the subject, during the high dive maneuver the descent rate was in the neighborhood of 9000 fpm. Anyhow the VSI was pegged at 6000fpm.
Not sure why but we never had to practice the high dives in the 747 sim events even though we would on occasion venture up to 45,000'. For some "overseas airlines" that inadvertently stalled and inverted the aircraft at high altitude putting the gear down at any speed (hell with the gear doors) seemed to be an effective panacea. Talk about a plane with huge and effective control surfaces!
T
T
stearmandriver
Members +
Hey Tom,
Who did you fly the -200 for? My current operator flew the "mud hen" for years, though that was a little before my time. I would have loved to see some of that flying though... though the current arctic and SE route structure is still plenty rewarding on the current fleet.
Who did you fly the -200 for? My current operator flew the "mud hen" for years, though that was a little before my time. I would have loved to see some of that flying though... though the current arctic and SE route structure is still plenty rewarding on the current fleet.
PhantomTweak
Members +
On a few trips with my father on the Stretch-8, he was a UAL pilot and made Captain when I was still pretty young, I saw that. Amazing the deceleration even just the Number 2 & 3 reversers could provide. All the passengers would wind up a bit more forward in their seats when he used them during a descent.
The '8s were his favorite plane. He just loved to fly it, and was sad when UAL retired it. He did thoroughly enjoy the 737, though. He flew the 737 like the Navy planes he flew when he was a Flight Instructor. Flew SNJ's in the Navy
I witnessed some very interesting landings in what he called the Minipig (737), especially when he was in a hurry at the end of a day full of commuter flights.
He never flew the 747, though he never told me why he didn't want to. I don't think he liked all the new automation they installed in it. He loved to fly, not push buttons. Never much cared for the 727 either, and never flew it very much, although he did retain his currency in it, even when assigned the 737.
Sorry, I ramble...
Pat☺
Bjoern
worst developer ever
Friday afternoon, return leg. There is only one needle on the ASI and it's red and white.
I flew the 737 100-200-300 and 400, 747 100-200-300-400, Intercontinental dash 8 and the Dreamlifter.
I flew the 737 series for Markair, an Alaskan company, and the 747's for Atlas.
The 747 was and is a wonderful plane to fly, very smooth and responsive, crushingly fast and capable. I would always hand fly it to altitude and a real performer. Taking off from Sydney to go to say Hong Kong or Shanghai, 10-11 hrs flying, not much cargo, but still a lot of fuel, we could climb to 41,000' in 11 minutes. In the current, and especially overseas atc environment the modern navigational equipment not only reduced our workload, it was essential. Flying today is not just a matter of accurately piloting where you want the plane to go, it also has to go where they want it to go, with great precision.
Flying complex SIDS and STARS in the steam gauge needle ball airspeed 737-200 could be very challenging! I think I have seen 172's as well equipped as some 100-200's I flew.
I flew the 737 series for Markair, an Alaskan company, and the 747's for Atlas.
The 747 was and is a wonderful plane to fly, very smooth and responsive, crushingly fast and capable. I would always hand fly it to altitude and a real performer. Taking off from Sydney to go to say Hong Kong or Shanghai, 10-11 hrs flying, not much cargo, but still a lot of fuel, we could climb to 41,000' in 11 minutes. In the current, and especially overseas atc environment the modern navigational equipment not only reduced our workload, it was essential. Flying today is not just a matter of accurately piloting where you want the plane to go, it also has to go where they want it to go, with great precision.
Flying complex SIDS and STARS in the steam gauge needle ball airspeed 737-200 could be very challenging! I think I have seen 172's as well equipped as some 100-200's I flew.
johndetrick
Charter Member
On a few trips with my father on the Stretch-8, he was a UAL pilot and made Captain when I was still pretty young, I saw that. Amazing the deceleration even just the Number 2 & 3 reversers could provide. All the passengers would wind up a bit more forward in their seats when he used them during a descent.
The '8s were his favorite plane. He just loved to fly it, and was sad when UAL retired it. He did thoroughly enjoy the 737, though. He flew the 737 like the Navy planes he flew when he was a Flight Instructor. Flew SNJ's in the Navy
I witnessed some very interesting landings in what he called the Minipig (737), especially when he was in a hurry at the end of a day full of commuter flights.
He never flew the 747, though he never told me why he didn't want to. I don't think he liked all the new automation they installed in it. He loved to fly, not push buttons. Never much cared for the 727 either, and never flew it very much, although he did retain his currency in it, even when assigned the 737.
Sorry, I ramble...
Pat☺
Having flown both the DC-8 and the B767, while I liked the ease of operating the 767, DC-8 holds a special place in my heart. After 14 years as a PFE on the Jurrassic jet and 2 flying the DC-8 as an FO, I really appreciated the stoutness of the classic Douglas design. It demanded constant attention and a lot of thinking ahead of the airplane. It demanded real hand flying piloting skills versus being an aircraft manager now. In the sim with the DC-8 if one was utilizing the autopilot too much it would mysteriously become inop. After trying to reengage the autopilot a few times a little voice from the instructors station would proclaim " Quit trying, it won't work." With the newer aircraft the autopilot is used extensively. I had a captain on the 767 bitch the whole time on a 4 hour flight and return that the autothrottle was inop. How times have changed when one has simply manually move two thrust levers!
Bjoern
worst developer ever
Reliability issues apart, how good or bad were the autopilots in the old crates (Sperry 50/150)?
Whenever I read about irritations caused by less than perfect response or precision of a virtual rendition of these mechanical Ottos (that not caused by any bugs in the programming), I just think that maybe armchair pilots are too spoilt when it comes to autoflight.
Whenever I read about irritations caused by less than perfect response or precision of a virtual rendition of these mechanical Ottos (that not caused by any bugs in the programming), I just think that maybe armchair pilots are too spoilt when it comes to autoflight.
johndetrick
Charter Member
They weren't that bad. They could hold altitude and heading. And when coupled to the FMS, they could fly the box quite nicely. They could do a coupled ILS down to Cat I minimums. Of course no VNAV was available, and every non precision approach was hand flown and of the old dive and drive variety.
There are still times when ya just have to be still able to fly the plane, well! There is a tendency for many operators to get everyone to rely on the automation, especially in Overseas operators that the countries do not have a large pilot resource to draw from. I remember it was considered a bit of a miracle years ago when a China Airlines FO actually landed the airplane when the Captain became incapacitated.
Congestion of the ATC environment and pace of arrivals etc have made a precision of flight necessary that was unavailable before GPS and FMS systems. With a modern flight director set up properly you CAN fly with such precision but at the expense of less concentration on the goings on around you. Not to miss or misinterpret ATC instructions for one! They sometimes come rapid fire in an accent you might have difficulties tuning your ear to.
It's still fun, just sometimes not as fun as the "good old days".
Congestion of the ATC environment and pace of arrivals etc have made a precision of flight necessary that was unavailable before GPS and FMS systems. With a modern flight director set up properly you CAN fly with such precision but at the expense of less concentration on the goings on around you. Not to miss or misinterpret ATC instructions for one! They sometimes come rapid fire in an accent you might have difficulties tuning your ear to.
It's still fun, just sometimes not as fun as the "good old days".