• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Decision time...

Rami

Rami

Administrator
Staff member
To all,

Regarding locations outside of the Mediterranean, would you prefer the Akemi Spitfire Mk. Vb or Bruno's model? Akemi's model already has a bunch of camo skins for RAF use, and certainly is not a bad model. For campaigns in the Med that I'll be overhauling, I will of course be using Bruno's trop / non-trop models.

If I use Bruno's model, we'll need some new skins (RAF and Russian)
 
Rami said:
To all,

Regarding locations outside of the Mediterranean, would you prefer the Akemi Spitfire Mk. Vb or Bruno's model? Akemi's model already has a bunch of camo skins for RAF use, and certainly is not a bad model. For campaigns in the Med that I'll be overhauling, I will of course be using Bruno's trop / non-trop models.

If I use Bruno's model, we'll need some new skins (RAF and Russian)
Click to expand...


Which one gets the best FPS? Use the most efficient one, so that you can place more aircrafts in the air with no performance degradation....

....or use Brunosk's, so that WE can get more skins....:d

Cheers!
KH :ernae:
 
xx

i made a request to Bruno long time ago when he was developing the trop model requested the file for non trop radiator as well to use in across the channel raids. i think morton was working on that but not sure,maybe tyou can ask sopwith camaleon as well.
dog1
 
They are both fine Models but if I where you I would use Akemi's model since it already has a bunch of camo skins for RAF use.:wiggle:
 
I will keep these under advisement. We're still a ways from there, but with the bases I got yesterday, we took a MAJOR leap forward.
 
None of the Above

If your concern is for reasonably accurate skins (ie something that looks like it belongs in the area your campaign is for) then my vote would be for the YAS Mk V.

Including both the tropical and non tropical variants I counted 26 paint schemes in my YAS Mk V folder.

However for shear "man this is a gas"itude Bruno's Spitfire is hard to beat.

Gavin
 
As we have the trop and non-trop Bruno,(and even possibility of an early Seafire from the same stable down the line) I'd suggest this for the player aircraft and use one of the other two for AI?

Let's face it, we all really want some more skins for Brunos masterpieces:gossip:
 
To all,

I have decided to go with Bruno's non-tropical Spits outside of the Mediterranean. RobH has done a Russian repaint, as well as some British skins.

I have updated the Continuation War campaign on my site to utilize Brunosk's Spitfire V, and also added it to the Kuban Bridgehead campaign, especially now that we have the Crimean repaint.

However, if you find framerate issues with Brunosk's model, you are free to swap in Akemi's model, she does not dissapoint.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top