• Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning old domain name stealing credentials

  • IMPORTANT INFORMATION - ALL MEMBERS PLEASE READ

    Due to an increase in the number of new members who are trying to systematically download our entire Resource Library (one new member yesterday tried to download 3,000+ files AT ONCE!) we are being forced to implement some changes regarding who can download what, how many files at a time and at what speed. As the forums and Resource Library share the same bandwidth when the Library gets overloaded with demand like that the forums fall over, as we have all seen recently. It's sad that greed has forced our hand in this way but we must do something for the benefit of all our legitimate members (many of whom paid money for the upkeep of the site) and to prevent the files stored here being used for nefarious purposes. Many of our uploads have specific conditions tied to them that forbid uploading to any other site or deny uploading to any site that has a 'paywall' (i.e. a pay to download policy). Due to the number of mass download attempts recently we can only assume that somebody, somewhere, is attempting to stock up a new file library with our files and we owe it to our up-loaders to protect their files and intellectual property especially as many (like my own LDR Development projects) are made available at SOH only and are specified as such in the 'read me' files.

    The forums and Resource Library will be taken offline as of 13:00 EDT with the forums coming back online shortly after without the resources library while we work on setting up permissions on the new Library module.

    We hope our members understand why we need to do this and will bear with us while we implement the changes.

    Thanks in anticipation, SOH ADMINISTRATION

    Downloads are now active. You may proceed with downloading as desired

    The download limits are a work in progress. Some settings are likely to need tweaking in the coming days.

HALO Device

Panther_99FS said:
Also note that I said "it did its job", again nowhere in the thread did I mention saving life....
Click to expand...
The HALO was introduced in order to save lives. Therefore its 'job' is to save lives, and if there was no threatened life to save it didn't do its job since it hadn't to. :a1310:

More seriously, even if it was by a wheel or a whole car, Leclerc's HALO has been hit and did not collapse. This alone is a kind of achievement.
 
Frontal head protection is important TO SAVE LIVES. See what happened to Henry Surtees and Justin Wilson (to name a few). I am not mentioning Jules Bianchi since in that case even the HALO would have collapse.

Once again, since nothing would have hit his head anyway, Charles Leclerc didn't need protection in that case and he would not have been hurt with or without the HALO.
 
wombat666 said:
How about we (all) agree to disagree. :applouse:
Click to expand...
Or maybe I should just stop arguing with people over 50. I have to do so every day at work, and it is just a PIA. Even if you show them factual and/or numerical facts as a proof they will never change their mind. Last month I spent one week (8 hours a day, 5 days a week) trying to show an elder colleague what he was planning to do was unrealistic and would lead to a disaster. He never listened to me, did things as he wanted to, and of course the anticipated disaster occured...
 
Roxane-21 said:
Or maybe I should just stop arguing with people over 50. I have to do so every day at work, and it is just a PIA. Even if you show them factual and/or numerical facts as a proof they will never change their mind. Last month I spent one week (8 hours a day, 5 days a week) trying to show an elder colleague what he was planning to do was unrealistic and would lead to a disaster. He never listened to me, did things as he wanted to, and of course the anticipated disaster occured...
Click to expand...

Your problem was that you automatically jumped into assumptions that I never stated in the title nor within the responses.
Has absolutely nothing to do with being over 50......:mixed-smiley-010:
 
wombat666 said:
How about we (all) agree to disagree. :applouse:
Click to expand...

I think we agree on the point that the HALO hasn't been the most beautiful thing added to the beautiful shape of an aerodynamic car...... :biggrin-new:

Roxane-21 said:
Or maybe I should just stop arguing with people over 50. I have to do so every day at work, and it is just a PIA. Even if you show them factual and/or numerical facts as a proof they will never change their mind. Last month I spent one week (8 hours a day, 5 days a week) trying to show an elder colleague what he was planning to do was unrealistic and would lead to a disaster. He never listened to me, did things as he wanted to, and of course the anticipated disaster occured...
Click to expand...

Don't tell me about it! You don't know how much time I have to spend explaining young engineers, that what they want to do has already been tried and is has already been proven that it can't work. Even when I provide them the scientific reports, they still have doubts. Or when I have to explain to them that the thing they are about to invent can be ordered already in the first hardware shop around the corner :biggrin-new:.

I have worked with many young engineers for most of my career and still do. Mutual respect is the key to be successful. Youngsters will help me to keep the dust from my ideas and they can benefit from my 30+ years of experience. And I still enjoy working with brilliant youngsters of half my age) and its never a PIA .

And a great design isn't always the best solution. I still often use the example of the paper-mate ballpoint and the ordinary carbon pencil. When you don't know this example, perhaps you should try to learn from the technical failures in history.

Cheers,
Huub
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top