• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

'F-22 Replacement? - Boeing F-15SE 'Silent Eagle'

Boeing has nailed the export versions of the F-35 with this one: as stealthy headon, but at a fraction of the cost. I love projects that come out of dedicated engineers working after hours on an idea...
 
To me, the inherent scalabilty if the F-15 family is what should make the biggest difference.

At the bottom end would be the current Charlie model with upgrade options ranging from vectored thrust to partial stealth. The SMTP version flew with canards, so that goes in the mix as well. Add in the Eagle's combat record and the institutional memory of current operators and it should be a winner.
 
I read an interesting article in this month's Flight Journal. The author suggested that with the price of the F-22 and the age of some of the F-15 airframes in service, he suggested the Eurofighter Typhoon as a worthy aircraft for many of the Air Guard units now flying F-16's and the older F-15A's. I know, being a "foreign" aircraft It would be a hard sell (Look at the KCX program) but not unheard of (Harrier) License production would be an option as well. Where stealth isn't needed the Typhoon is a solid performer and has been liked by every US pilot that has flown it.

Any thoughts on this?


Brian
 
The Typhoon is such an outstanding aircraft that I wish we would've invented it. I like to put it like this: the raptor does a few things a 9 out of a ten, and then it's a handful at 3's. The Typhoon is all eights across the board. Alas, we didn't invent it. America needs to invest in itself right now, and that doesn't mean that we need more bloated projects offering a questionable capability/cost ratio. It means that our projects from here on out need to look more like the bird of prey and silent eagle projects.

I don't place much faith in dedicated stealth aircraft anymore, the concept is relative and it's a total package with only a portion directly contributed to RCS. I do, however, place a great amount of faith in programs like this one that offer up aircraft showing promise of doing everything an 8 out of 10.
 
I wonder how many Typhoons the USAF could buy instead of the 180 F-22's...

I imagine that it is A LOT more than 185.

Not only that, but the capability that the Typhoon offers is impressive to say the least: the NAV, radar, countermeasures and the weapons are brilliant. Just take a look at the specs of the meteor BVR missile... If I'm not mistaking, it's the longest range BVR missile around.

And, license production would mean that no american jobs are lost (in the manufacturing part of the program anyway)

Just my 2 € cents worth.

PB
 
And, license production would mean that no american jobs are lost (in the manufacturing part of the program anyway)
Click to expand...

My thoughts exactly... Build them in Marrietta (Lockheed) or Fort Worth (Boeing).

Even if we kept them equipped with AMMRAMS and AIM-9X's it would still be a potent air to air platform.


Brian
 
Brian_Gladden said:
My thoughts exactly... Build them in Marrietta (Lockheed) or Fort Worth (Boeing).

Even if we kept them equipped with AMMRAMS and AIM-9X's it would still be a potent air to air platform.


Brian
Click to expand...

I think Fort Worth is Lockheed as well.
 
It's a loooong road to buy an aircraft here, Panther. Way too much politics involved I'm afraid... Last night the decision to buy the Lightning was postponed once again, but will will invest in a test aircraft of the F-35.

Wouldn't mind seeing the Gripen in the Dutch skies though, as the NG version is looking quite good. The biggest question are the air to ground capabilities of the Gripen, a role in which the F-16 was mostly used the last ten years or so. The F-35 can carry two JDAMs internally, not sure if the Gripen can carry these. The opponents we faced recently do not really require a stealth aircraft. The Gripen has a low RCS too, but needs to carry all its stores externally.
The purchase and maintenance of the Gripen might be cheaper, but we will also have to buy new tools etc when we switch from an American to a European manufacturer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top