• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Su-27

Agreed. Saw it earlier and the Vc doesn't look to bad, interested to hear what other think that end up getting it.
 
noddy said:
. . . . .I know that the previous offerings from the Dev have not been brilliant, but I am almost tempted!
Click to expand...
Personally, I don't care for him or his work, but looking at the screens, the external model looks pretty well done, there are a lot of liveries and the VC texturing looks pretty good as well. The only things I noticed were that there are not many, if any, custom gauges. . .everything appears to be default and there's no mention of a sound package with it, so does that mean it's aliased to another aircraft (like the Lear?lol). Finally, the price is not bad at all for what you appear to get with this package.
 
Hmmm, the nose looks odd on these Flankers. Too short IMHO, and the two-seater cockpit is too short as well. Only default gauges, no mention of a soundpack or a true native FsX model, and I have no idea what those missiles are supposed to be?

Think I'll pass on this one, no matter how much I like Russian aircraft!
 
Fully agree with the previous 2 posters on the exterior model flaws. No surprise as this has been a weakness with other products of this developer. It may not exactly be the Su-27 but Alphasim's FS2004 Su-33 looks much better and it works in FSX.

Henk.
 
Oh dear lord, an SU-27.... I am most very very tempted indeed. But I don't think I trust this dev :( Why are Russian jets sooooo neglected? Ugh :p
 
Sorry, but this is unacceptable...I sent an email to simmarket, though I doubt I'll hear back. I know this has been covered before a million times, but they could at least put an asterisk on ports. Next time I'll let some other sucker buy it first...:a1451:
 
The stores only have the information provided by the vendor to go on to say the compatibility or functionality of anything that comes in. They cannot possibly test every add-on so assuming they can somehow mark them to say what they are is pretty unrealistic, djscoo.

As you say, this has been covered many times before and as k-d said, every other Meyer product has been a port, so even a tiny bit of research would have gone a long way, as usual. ;)
 
One of these days we will get a decent Su-27, but this ain't it:kilroy:
The vigil continues...........................:isadizzy:
 
djscoo said:
Sorry, but this is unacceptable...I sent an email to simmarket, though I doubt I'll hear back. I know this has been covered before a million times, but they could at least put an asterisk on ports. Next time I'll let some other sucker buy it first...:a1451:
Click to expand...

I agree completely!

BTW the vendors email is listed on the product page, we should all send an email about proper labeling of products.
 
I agree also, I'm yet to see 1 decent aircraft from afs design, I despirately hope one day we will get a decent flanker for fsx but as Scratch said, this ain't it!
 
This is misrepresentation by omission. Demand your money back and delete the product.
If they don't agree let us know. There are enough people using Dx10 for unlabelled port-overs to be wholly unacceptable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top