• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

A question for the camera experts

You can always get the new Nikon AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II. There's a comparison up at digitalreview.ca of the Nikon lens and the Sigma version.

Do know that a superzoom like that one, even that kind of exceptional quality, is still less than a decent combination of a, say 16-85 and AF-S 70-300. The price is too, of course...

It's just, how much money do you want to spend on it ?
 
JorisVandenBerghe said:
You can always get the new Nikon AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II. There's a comparison up at digitalreview.ca of the Nikon lens and the Sigma version...[snip]
Click to expand...

Hi Joris, that is the lens I purchased. Both Thom Hogan and [FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Ken Rockwell[/FONT] really like the lens. I figure they know much more than I do, so decided it was a good purchase. Only time will tell.
:icon29:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top