L39ZA

[g1f99059]

FSX native... L39ZA
http://www.indoflyer.net/content.asp?contentid=31479

 

[Daveroo]

went to that page and tried to create an account but it told me i could not create an account...dont know why thought..i cant read that language

 

[Warrant]

No problems here. Just gave a username and a password (2x), received an activation mail and currently downloading.
Did you check if you entered a valid e-mail adress?

 

[ryanbatc]

Someone please make sure its not the Lotus L39

 

[Warrant]

Still downloading, that site is SLOW! Tell ya in a minute

Edit: download complete, zipfile corrupt. So....no L-39!

 

[djscoo]

Someone please make sure its not the Lotus L39

It doesn't look like it...
View attachment 31520View attachment 31521View attachment 31522

Screenshots are DX-10.

 

[Warrant]

It doesn't look like it...
View attachment 31520View attachment 31521View attachment 31522

Screenshots are DX-10.

Looks nice. Restarted the download ten minutes ago, hope this time i'll be able to open it

Edit: finally got it. Gonna restart FSX now and have a look. Screenies look promising!

 

[Hanimichal]

Downloaded and tested



Nice model external and VC.

But his flight I ...
is simple to much, I prefer some more

 

[p14u2nv]

went to that page and tried to create an account but it told me i could not create an account...dont know why thought..i cant read that language

Just dload a translator Dave, I use the Google version.

http://www.google.com/support/toolbar/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=146786

 

[djscoo]

I just left the fields I couldn't read blank.

 

[g1f99059]

there's a newer version at flightsim.com
http://www.flightsim.com/file.php?cm=SEARCH1&fsec=89&fname=ht_l39za-011.zip

 

[Bjoern]

Screenies of the version from Flightsim.

I like this aircraft. A nice freeware alternative to the portover L-39 and the payware one.

 

[kahruw]

there's a newer version at flightsim.com
http://www.flightsim.com/file.php?cm=SEARCH1&fsec=89&fname=ht_l39za-011.zip

What's the difference with the older version?

 

[g1f99059]

the stopwatch is working !? :mixedsmi:

 

[kahruw]

the stopwatch is working !? :mixedsmi:

Nice aircraft. The price is better than the lotus...it's free

 

[Kiwikat]

The price is better than the lotus...it's free

I beg to differ. The Lotus one would be worth it if it cost 5 times as much.

It is very rare for something as good as the Lotus L-39 to show up in FS. I can count the number of aircraft that are in the same league as it on a few fingers. It's just my opinion though.

//Back to the actual topic

 

[Bjoern]

It is very rare for something as innovative as the Lotus L-39 to show up in FS.

Fixed.

Lotus' L-39 was definately a milestone, but more for its never-seen-before method of rendering landing lights and effects of icing and rain on the aircraft without causing degradation in performance.

 

[g1f99059]

in my opinion, Lotus L-39 has to be better, it's payware, and the freeware one should be not as better as the Lotus is. it would be unfair for Lotus if you could get free aircraft addon of the same kind and the same quality .

 

[falcon409]

in my opinion, Lotus L-39 has to be better, it's payware, and the freeware one should be not as better as the Lotus is. it would be unfair for Lotus if you could get free aircraft addon of the same kind and the same quality .

There is no comparisons to be made between these two aircraft other than being similar aircraft and the price. The freeware version is just that. . .a decent model with an ample VC and it flies. . .worthy of being freeware but nothing more.
Download it if you feel the need to and don't expect greatness. No other discussions about comparisons are necessary.:salute: