• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

HU: Aerosoft OV-10 Bronco

P

Peritas

Charter Member
Mathijs Kok from Aerosoft wrote: "We like to announce our internal projects as soon as possible but this could to be a record. We do not even have an image. The same team that done the F-16 (partly), Catalina and Airbus X has now started on a project that we codenamed (don't tell others) OV-10 Bronco X."

I believe that is very, very interesting...

Luca
 
Peritas said:
Mathijs Kok from Aerosoft wrote: "We like to announce our internal projects as soon as possible but this could to be a record. We do not even have an image. The same team that done the F-16 (partly), Catalina and Airbus X has now started on a project that we codenamed (don't tell others) OV-10 Bronco X."

I believe that is very, very interesting...
Luca
Click to expand...
lol, lol, pretty funny. . .anyone who has kept track of Aerosoft over the years knows this isn't a new project, they started the OV-10 years ago, even had WIP shots of the VC and exterior. Either they scraped the whole original project and are starting over or they've simply revised a project they figure most folks forgot about.:salute:
 
falcon409 said:
lol, lol, pretty funny. . .anyone who has kept track of Aerosoft over the years knows this isn't a new project, they started the OV-10 years ago, even had WIP shots of the VC and exterior. Either they scraped the whole original project and are starting over or they've simply revised a project they figure most folks forgot about.:salute:
Click to expand...

Hi there,

I bet the project got on the back-burner at some point. I've asked Mathijs about it several times and he indicated to me it'll turn up one day or another. Might as well call it a fresh start, IMO, as the 3D guy set to "start" it now is beyond capable. The PBY was also put to rest for a while as the modeller that did that left. I'd say let's focus on the coming project, I doubt the F-16 would have turned up in its present form up had it not been for this same 3D guy. This 3D guru, also did completely new PBY ext and int models and "saved" this project as well.

FSX payware development is resource-consuming and time-consuming, especially when you work as a team.

I am not a part of this team, for your info:salute:

Thanks
 
Reddog said:
Why bother when u can get Piglet's for free.
Click to expand...

Piglet's will probably give you three times as many FPS too.

I really hope this isn't yet another one of Aerosoft's planes with 400,000 polys. You don't need a model that large to be detailed and pretty. I think the L-39 is the ultimate case in point... it has abundant eye candy and you can have 5 of them on screen at once with little FPS hit.

I guess we'll see what they do with this one. :kilroy:
 
Hi,

Well there's always the option to buy or not to buy, luckily enough. In addition there's always the possibility to wait and see what customers say after they bought it. The PBY is a pretty detailed model, inside out and I have no problems with it over most scenery with my 2-3 years old system. I find it very smooth in fact.


Thanks
 
Hi Dag! I have the PBY and the Twin Otter: IMHO they are within the best aircrafts for FSX...
Also, your repaint are awesome: your canadian bare PBY is a must!
By the way, do you know why Aerosoft do not release the repaint of red Vingtor?

Best regards,
Luca
 
Peritas said:
Hi Dag! I have the PBY and the Twin Otter: IMHO they are within the best aircrafts for FSX...
Also, your repaint are awesome: your canadian bare PBY is a must!
By the way, do you know why Aerosoft do not release the repaint of red Vingtor?

Best regards,
Luca
Click to expand...

No, I'm not sure why it was not included but my best guess would be an evaluation "higher up" in the system. We had many Norwegian paints at hand... But as far as I am concerned, they could have skipped one of mine.

Thanks
 
Dag, can you upload here this single repaint (red Vingtor)?
I'd like a lot to have it, please..... :jump::jump::jump::jump::jump::jump::jump::jump::jump::jump:
Luca
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top