• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

Helldiver..

I hope you realize the can of worms you've opened by making this plane.

If you thought rivet-counters were bad... Lol

Looks good though! Anxious to see more. :D

Oh yeah, i know...

Prowler
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
PS-024-110.jpg

PS-024-109.jpg

PS-024-108.jpg

PS-024-107.jpg

PS-024-106.jpg
 
Mike:
Got them all, you sent them to me a while ago

Prowler
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
The Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class!


Yep, that should get our own Helldiver's attention... real fast. :wavey:


Nice to see another WW II aircraft being developed for FSX.:jump:
 
It is a beast of a looking aircraft - raw, powerful and brutish. No wonder it earned that tag. :)
 
May I ask what filled the upper section between the cockpits? Surely the bomb bay was not that tall?

Directly behind the pilot was 100 plus gallon fuel tank and slightly further radio gear , most this sat on top off the bomb bay .
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
Lookin' good so far...hope it's gonna' be the SB2C-1C with full wheel covers and large spinner.

<TABLE cellPadding=3 border=1><TBODY><TR><TH>SB2C-1C</TH><TD>Two 20mm cannon, first to fly in combat</TD><TD>Rabaul 11/43</TD><TD align=right>778</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

View attachment 13284

although I wouldn't mind having a later variant as well

<TABLE cellPadding=3 border=1><TBODY><TR><TH>SB2C-4</TH><TD>Perforated dive flaps, extra wing fittings. Incl. SB2C-4E</TD><TD>appeared mid 1944</TD><TD align=right>2,045</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
It´s a SB2C-4/SB2C-5 since there were minor external differences no earlier variants SO FAR are scheduled, we´ll see how it develops.What i can promise is that it will be as "bitchy" as the real thing was..

Prowler
 
I'm definately looking forward this this "Bitchin' Beauty" Hope she sells big! Lots of cool paints for this one.
 
Behind the cockpit is the battery, not a fuel tank. It is accessed by a panel on the starboard side just behind the cockpit.
The Confederates version of the SB2C is in bad repair as can be seen by the deflated oleo strut on the tail wheel. The radios and the life preservers are missing. The lower portions of the landing gear covers are missing.
So far so good as the work that has been done. Good Luck.
 
The rather significant oval shape of the engine cowling/fuselage can't be missed in all of the screenies.... is that Ok ?....

http://k43.pbase.com/o6/85/668285/1/70310875.Kdt2cjt5.DSC_0202abg.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kensaviation/124973656/

I mean, couldn't it be a tad or two too oval ?....

If it'll prove something needs to be done about it it's always better to do it in early stage of development....

Otherwise looking pretty slick !

Just asking... looking forward to a good native FSX representation of this awesome beast ! :cool:

cheers,
jan
 
Prowler 1111 - I just came across a bunch of SB2C detailed drawings, kinda yellowed with age, that must be 60 years old. It's quite detailed. Your welcome to have them. I was about to throw them out. Let me know.
 
Back
Top