• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

F8F wip shots

MudMarine, I worked on these aircraft and flew with them and as long as I live, I want to make sure that they are potrayed correctly. It's important to me.
As a Marine, I would never criticise how you clean your gun or lace up your boots.
 
I don't think anyone is questioning your intent, Helldiver.

As a result of your input the issues have been rectified, as per above.

All the best..
Dan.
 
ok time for me to step in here.

The old canopy has been corrected, the one you've edited is the old canopy.

The new canopy has been built around photos that have been interlaced onto the new canopy within 3d studio max. No more alterations will be made to the canopy Im afraid end of story, we was working till 0300 hrs gmt this morning on the new alterations.

unfortunately we're not able to work to .5 of a mm, please state a studio that does...

on a personal note all of vstudios team are now restricted from posting on SOH regarding the F8F. We're working from photos on all angles, we've ditched the Grumman drawings and some people are simply not happy.

Regards
 
Fairly put.

I for one am have my credit card no waiting to be associated with this product now :salute:
 
This thread illustrates why most developers keep their work to themselves until they are ready for release.
 
MudMarine, I worked on these aircraft and flew with them and as long as I live, I want to make sure that they are potrayed correctly. It's important to me.
As a Marine, I would never criticise how you clean your gun or lace up your boots.

Got you point a long time ago, everyone has. That doesn't mean I don't respect it!
 
ok time for me to step in here.

The old canopy has been corrected, the one you've edited is the old canopy.

The new canopy has been built around photos that have been interlaced onto the new canopy within 3d studio max. No more alterations will be made to the canopy Im afraid end of story, we was working till 0300 hrs gmt this morning on the new alterations.

unfortunately we're not able to work to .5 of a mm, please state a studio that does...

on a personal note all of vstudios team are now restricted from posting on SOH regarding the F8F. We're working from photos on all angles, we've ditched the Grumman drawings and some people are simply not happy.

Regards

I don't blame you! Makes me sad to see that but I understand.
 
I really appreciate developers sharing their work in progress. I very much enjoy seeing what is in the works and consider it a real treat. It would be a real loss if developers did stop post WIP shots.
 
This thread illustrates why most developers keep their work to themselves until they are ready for release.


True and that is OK so long as they have a good strong team of beta testers who are not just "wow, super, lovely" yes men who are not honest and diligent in their approach to the task.
 
This thread illustrates why most developers keep their work to themselves until they are ready for release.
Yeah, but by not sharing developmental stage shots an aircraft can be released with glaring errors and omissions. I'm really happy that the shots were posted here and corrections made before the release. I would think a developer would prefer it that way.
 
This thread illustrates why most developers keep their work to themselves until they are ready for release.

I think we as users or potential buyers have a serious responsibility here. I appreciate that developers step out and listen to us, and I think that therefore the evolving issues of a devolpment should be solved in a more professional manner, on both sides.
VS took Helldivers (ond others) suggestions seriously, and I think that is great and it will add to the quality of the product. If they had kept their work to themselves there might have been a flaw in the outcome.
I just think for us "professional users" that this is could be a future platform to influence the work of "professional developers" without being dedicated beta testers. We, on both sides, should keep that in mind.

My 2 ct
Mark
 
I think we as users or potential buyers have a serious responsibility here. I appreciate that developers step out and listen to us, and I think that therefore the evolving issues of a devolpment should be solved in a more professional manner, on both sides.
VS took Helldivers (ond others) suggestions seriously, and I think that is great and it will add to the quality of the product. If they had kept their work to themselves there might have been a flaw in the outcome.
I just think for us "professional users" that this is could be a future platform to influence the work of "professional developers" without being dedicated beta testers. We, on both sides, should keep that in mind.

My 2 ct
Mark

Agreed! Like I've said over and over again, there are ways of dealing with questions; example, send a PM to the developer. Tearing someone's work a part in a public forum is just down right rude to me! JMO!!!!

PS If anyone cares, I'm done kicking this dead horse! Give me a Bearkitty to fly!! :)
 
Sad to hear of the banning progress shots here.

I hope my post regarding the exhaust plate didn't break the camel's back - I truly meant only to make an observation. If I offended, please accept my apologies. In truth, I'm sure no one here at SOH has anything but pure intentions - that of helping further the work. That said, internet posts are pretty mono-dimensional, and can often obscure true intent - so I can certainly appreciate if the modelling team got frustrated.

Regardless, best of luck with the model - and from where I'm standing, had it been released as it was at the start of this thread, I would already have been impressed. I guess I'm a "glass half full" type of person. I can only imagine how good the final project will be - all the best, and thanks for giving us this brief window into the beauty of what's coming!.

dl
 
Deano - I hope you will consider an alternative.

I can see not wanting your crew to respond directly to criticism of your work in progress screenshots as it can waste valuable time

but please - do not stop posting the screenshots!

I understand that criticism can come in all forms - from well informed and supported points of concern posted with regard to the developers....all the way down to unsupported and ill mannered rants. I further understand that it can be difficult to refrain from replying to some of the latter...

But - if you work in a bubble with no objective viewpoint you might create something that has provable inaccuracies built in, where on the other hand - if you can post your WIPS, and then stand back while the tempest rages - you can ultimately sift through the useful posts and utterly disregard the waste product...and glean some useful information.

Pacific aircraft of WWII - no matter which nation they were built by - seem to have the most visceral fans and self proclaimed aficionados of all the flying machine genres extant

Good luck sir - and my condolences on your campaign to satisfy this group

we mean well - we just know not what a pita we can be sometimes.
 
I want to apologize for any problems I caused Vertigo or for any wrong I may have done to anyone at SOH, I am heartily sorry.
In my zealous effort to make sure that the aircraft I was involved in is done accurately. There is too much about WWII that is distorted and it's a shame. So I try to correct things I feel strongly about and for that I apologize.

 
Same with me, my criticism is meant to be constructive, not hurtful. I apologize to anyone who was offended by my posts.
 
Back
Top