• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

A4 K Shot!

peter12213

FSX Acceleration!
2010-8-9_21-30-49-937_edited-1.jpg
 
The lowcost F-16...

With an afterburner, the thing would have been even MORE awesome!
 
Agreed but the ultimate version the US navy used could still climb turn and burn with the best! Remember for the date it was built and designed it was an outstanding performer!
 
Waaah....I get grumpy every time I see an A-4K..the RNZAF examples are in open air storage due to the shortmindiness of the previous goverment of scrapping the F-16 deal (an incredibly cheap deal) and then the combat force in its entirity (..and then spending a huge amount on way too many LAV-25s).

They suppose to be heading to the US with a civilan defence contractor but they need to come up with $144m - looks like this is not going to happen though and the whole sale process that has been dragging on for 9 years is a joke.

In updated form, the RNZAF Skyhawks had F-16 avionics and weapon system - they would of even been better if they had re-engined them with GE404s like the Singaporeans did.

Good shot though!
 
suppose to be heading to the US with a civilan defence contractor but they need to come up with $144m

$144m for how many airframes...does that include a spares package....SOH whip around?


:bump:


Nice pic,Peter...the Scooter was/is one of my all time favourites. I preferred the USN examples,however. :)
 
Agreed but the ultimate version the US navy used could still climb turn and burn with the best! Remember for the date it was built and designed it was an outstanding performer!

I don't quite get your point. The A-4K was so good because it was lighter and cleaner than the Navy's ultimate A-4F (hence the missing hump).

If you want to compare the A-4K, take the Marine's A-4M or the A-4AR or A-4SU.
 
What I was simply saying was, that in its final form for Top Gun, (granted stripped down), that even without a burner the skyhawk would often go vertical with the Tomcat, not many single engine non afterburning powered aircraft could do that especially 20 years ago, the Mig 17 certainly couldn't which this was supposed to be in adversary training and that had a burner!
 
Back
Top