There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.




...awaits the inevitable "Not another Spitfire/Mustang/Cub etc etc etc" musings!
![]()
Geez! ANOTHER Spitfire? :isadizzy: Why didn't they just do a Mustang!? Or something even I can fly, like a Cub? Or an nice twin, like a Lightning, or a more modern plane, like a Warthog. But wait - those have been done to death too! Next thing you know, they will try a B-25. They should be focusing on something that hasn't been done, like a Bearcat.
Brian
(was that OK? I didn't get really obnoxious)
I don't like Mustangs, so your safe there.
If people like to voice opinions in regards to "not another spit" Im more than happy to keep her to myself. Me being a Brit its my sort after aircraft, so the model, textures and features will be unparalleled. It would be a shame to hog it all to myself.![]()
Geez! ANOTHER [LINESTRIKE]Spitfire[/LINESTRIKE]? :isadizzy: Why didn't they just do a[LINESTRIKE] Mustang[/LINESTRIKE]!? Or something even I can fly, like a [LINESTRIKE]Cub[/LINESTRIKE]? Or an nice twin, like a [LINESTRIKE]Lightning[/LINESTRIKE], or a more modern plane, like a [LINESTRIKE]Warthog[/LINESTRIKE]. But wait - those have been done to death too! Next thing you know, they will try a [LINESTRIKE]B-25[/LINESTRIKE]. They should be focusing on something that hasn't been done, like a [LINESTRIKE]Bearcat[/LINESTRIKE].
Brian
(was that OK? I didn't get really obnoxious)
AckAck, theres no need to keep things to yourself, You have more right to voice your opinions here than what I do. I take all comments and suggestions into consideration. :salute:
(. Perhaps you would like to create a Sikorsky S-76 (A, A+, B, C, C+) for FSX? 
I didn't use enough smilies then... It was a completely tongue-in-cheek post in response to Kilo Delta awaiting "the inevitable "Not another Spitfire/Mustang/Cub etc etc etc" musings!"
Actually, looking back, I didn't use any smilies, relying instead on the proximity to the previous post. I apologize for any misunderstanding. This is not the first time that my (unmarked) sarcasm has caused misinterpretation, and you would think I would learn from that (but noooo, I don't). I even intended to put a smiley face in the post, but in the end forgot to put it on.
It's not my place to suggest what you should create, but if you decide to tackle a subject I am familiar enough with to accurately critique, I will do so. I probably won't mention pilot size though(. Perhaps you would like to create a Sikorsky S-76 (A, A+, B, C, C+) for FSX?
Brian![]()