• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

Aerosoft Preview: American Aerolites Falcon Ultralight

I like the disclaimer at the bottom of the specs where it notes that the specs given are based on a pilot weighing 150lbs, with no wind and a temp of 59. The resulting cruise speed is 60, lol. Which means an average pilot weighing 200 lbs with a 5 to 10kt wind on a summers day might see a cruise speed just above stall, lol.:salute:
 
falcon409 said:
I like the disclaimer at the bottom of the specs where it notes that the specs given are based on a pilot weighing 150lbs, with no wind and a temp of 59. The resulting cruise speed is 60, lol. Which means an average pilot weighing 200 lbs with a 5 to 10kt wind on a summers day might see a cruise speed just above stall, lol.:salute:
Click to expand...

Hehe.
Yeah the I think the Falcon was made late 70's to early 80's.
Think 'average' pilot back then was about 50lbs lighter.
I know I was a whole lot lighter back then... :isadizzy: :icon_lol:

It was cutting edge for its time.
No cables to support the wings.
Not bad for a single cylinder, 27hp (on a good day) engine.

Actually, I read somewhere the Falcon held the altitude record at almost 27,000 feet for a long time.
Don't know if it still does.

I'd actually like to see one without gauges, just the air speed tube on the strut.
Hope this one is reasonably priced.
I'd like to get my hands on it.
 
Dain Arns said:
. . . . . .Actually, I read somewhere the Falcon held the altitude record at almost 27,000 feet for a long time.
Don't know if it still does.

I'd actually like to see one without gauges, just the air speed tube on the strut.
Hope this one is reasonably priced.
I'd like to get my hands on it.
Click to expand...
The listed Max altitude is 15,000 which is pretty amazing for that type aircraft. I'm with you though, I hope it's reasonably priced as I would enjoy giving it a shot over PNW. Here's hoping!:salute:
 
I have the POH for a 2 seat ultralight taildragger where the weight limitations for the pilot are minimum 69kg and maximum 92kg.

As it is a taildragger the pilot actually sits in front of the main wheels and well in front of the wings and CoG. The passenger sits behind the pilot and is located where the CoG would be. I guess if he weighs too much she noses over. Too light and you have to add ballast to the nose.
 
anthony31 said:
I have the POH for a 2 seat ultralight taildragger where the weight limitations for the pilot are minimum 69kg and maximum 92kg.

As it is a taildragger the pilot actually sits in front of the main wheels and well in front of the wings and CoG. The passenger sits behind the pilot and is located where the CoG would be. I guess if he weighs too much she noses over. Too light and you have to add ballast to the nose.
Click to expand...

A Maxair Drifter?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top