• There seems to be an up tick in Political commentary in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site we know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religiours commentary out of the fourms.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politicion will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment amoung members. It is a poison to the community. We apprciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

Carl Sagan

He and Timothy Ferris were/are the best there ever were/are at explaining the Cosmos to laymen. And his delivery made it all the more enticing.

Caz
 
A great quote from his last wife -

“When my husband died, because he was so famous and known for not being a believer, many people would come up to me - it still sometimes happens - and ask me if Carl changed at the end and converted to a belief in an afterlife. They also frequently ask me if I think I will see him again. Carl faced his death with unflagging courage and never sought refuge in illusions. The tragedy was that we knew we would never see each other again. I don’t ever expect to be reunited with Carl. But, the great thing is that when we were together, for nearly twenty years, we lived with a vivid appreciation of how brief and precious life is. We never trivialized the meaning of death by pretending it was anything other than a final parting. Every single moment that we were alive and we were together was miraculous - not miraculous in the sense of inexplicable or supernatural. We knew we were beneficiaries of chance… That pure chance could be so generous and so kind… That we could find each other, as Carl wrote so beautifully in Cosmos, you know, in the vastness of space and the immensity of time… That we could be together for twenty years. That is something which sustains me and it’s much more meaningful… The way he treated me and the way I treated him, the way we took care of each other and our family, while he lived. That is so much more important than the idea I will see him someday. I don’t think I’ll ever see Carl again. But I saw him. We saw each other. We found each other in the cosmos, and that was wonderful.”


 
A great quote from his last wife -
“When my husband died, because he was so famous and known for not being a believer, many people would come up to me - it still sometimes happens - and ask me if Carl changed at the end and converted to a belief in an afterlife. They also frequently ask me if I think I will see him again. Carl faced his death with unflagging courage and never sought refuge in illusions. The tragedy was that we knew we would never see each other again. I don’t ever expect to be reunited with Carl. But, the great thing is that when we were together, for nearly twenty years, we lived with a vivid appreciation of how brief and precious life is. We never trivialized the meaning of death by pretending it was anything other than a final parting. Every single moment that we were alive and we were together was miraculous - not miraculous in the sense of inexplicable or supernatural. We knew we were beneficiaries of chance… That pure chance could be so generous and so kind… That we could find each other, as Carl wrote so beautifully in Cosmos, you know, in the vastness of space and the immensity of time… That we could be together for twenty years. That is something which sustains me and it’s much more meaningful… The way he treated me and the way I treated him, the way we took care of each other and our family, while he lived. That is so much more important than the idea I will see him someday. I don’t think I’ll ever see Carl again. But I saw him. We saw each other. We found each other in the cosmos, and that was wonderful.”



The thing I like about her statement is NOT whether there is a God or not, which we will not be discussing in this thread :), but it is the love they obviously shared. That to me is wonderful.
 
The thing I like about her statement is NOT whether there is a God or not, which we will not be discussing in this thread :), but it is the love they obviously shared. That to me is wonderful.

Absolutely. He was a lucky man. He was also agnostic so there's not much to discuss on that score!
 
Died today in 1996.

Truly a loss - forget the likes of John Lennon and all those people. Sagan was truly a loss to the human race.

I would love to have the 70s era Sagan alive today, to do a Cosmos show with current technology/knowledge. That would be amazing.

The man was certainly enthusiastic.

I do miss Carl Sagan - I still have his COSMOS series on VHS -, but I also miss John Lennon. They both had something to offer to the world. Art and science are not opposing sides, they are often walking hand in hand. If Carl and John were still with us, I'm sure they would agree with me.
 
Yes a giant loss, but the baton has been picked up to a certain extent by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Phil Plaitt and several others.
 
Everybody should live their lives with as much affection and caring support as his wife described.
 
Yes a giant loss, but the baton has been picked up to a certain extent by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Phil Plaitt and several others.

I'm not as much for Tyson as I am for Michio Kaku who, to my mind, is nearly as good as Sagan. But most all of these mentioned have the gift of being able to talk, on the air, to people and not make them feel lost or stupid. The only physics person I ever knew was so abstruse in conversation that he lost me after the 2nd or 3rd sentence.
 
I'm also a fan of Kaku - I've read a few of his books, good stuff!

All Lennon did was make being a hippie cool. :a1451:
 
You used to be able to get hold of Richard Feynman lectures on CD. You can still get them in print. They are mind blowing and very funny. Sagan was interesting but Feynman really was a genius.



Of course neither Feynman or Sagan wrote very good songs!
 
All Lennon did was make being a hippie cool. :a1451:

Also, thanks to his wife, I can call my pals' girlfriends "Yoko Onos". They totally tore my circle of friends apart. Heck, I haven't seen some of the guys in an awfully long time!
 
Comparing John Lennon to Sagan is apples and oranges anyhow. I don't even know why I got involved in a Ford - Chevy debate. Have a nice night, everyone!

Don
 
Back
Top