• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Server side Maintenance is done. We still have an update to the forum software to run but that one will have to wait for a better time.

HM RAF New Toy

Matt Wynn

Matt Wynn

Charter Member
expected to be in service before the year is out but here she is; The A330 'Voyager', she will replace the L-1011 'Tristar' and the Venerable 'Viccy Ten's in the long run... and i gotta admit.... i kinda like her...

VoyagerlandingatBoscombesmall.jpg


And the Article:
Voyager Arrives in the UK
 
Nice, and I rather like her too - just not sure about that name, Voyager? What will they name the A400M, "Equinox"?
 
AndyG43 said:
Nice, and I rather like her too - just not sure about that name, Voyager? What will they name the A400M, "Equinox"?
Click to expand...

A400M Prototype is called the 'Grizzly' by Airbus.... in RAF Service it will become 'Atlas' (Excellent more Greek-ness for the RAF) :icon_lol:
 
Smoothie said:
A400M Prototype is called the 'Grizzly' by Airbus.... in RAF Service it will become 'Atlas' (Excellent more Greek-ness for the RAF) :icon_lol:
Click to expand...
Think it was misquoted from a senior RAF officer who said: "At last!" after the latest round of project rescheduling!
Do like the A330 as a refueller, it's very well suited to the task.
 
Wing_Z said:
Think it was misquoted from a senior RAF officer who said: "At last!" after the latest round of project rescheduling!
Do like the A330 as a refueller, it's very well suited to the task.
Click to expand...

Tell that to the US Congress!! :icon_lol:

Looking forward to finally seeing some real air to air Typhoon refuelling pics, instead of the endless 'shopped ones. And a short lineup at some future IAT, with RAF, Aussie, Saudi, UAE and (possibly) Indian & Brazilian tankers would be awfully impressive.
 
thats not on noddy, we have plenty of jets! their just sat in hangers awaiting sufficent spare parts! :kilroy:
 
oh theres calls to re-instate the Harrier because of the Libya Crisis... as the Typhoons are mainly Air Superiority Fighters, not mud movers (Despite the FGR.4 status), Harriers would lower the costs of being involved in Libya... plus we could base them off the coast minutes of flight time away as opposed to Hours...

back on track, A400M should be at RIAT this year again and Hopefully so should the Voyager...
 
Smoothie said:
Harriers would lower the costs of being involved in Libya...
Click to expand...

sorry smoothie but the whole cheaper thing is a load of tosh in my opion .. first we'd need to de-mothball em, but back anything that was taken out, flight test em, give the crews a quick refresher (pilots and techies), then pay them op pay/flying pay etc

plus we could base them off the coast minutes of flight time away as opposed to Hours...
Click to expand...
well we'd have to find a carrier from somewhere, which would need fuel, suplies, crew and ammo etc. All of which needs buying/paying.

Dont get me wrong i was sad to see the harrier go, but the navy praticly killed it by getting rid of the carriers to use it on. Without the carrier the harriers no where near as good as the tornado and hopefully in a few years, the typhoon.
 
stiz said:
Dont get me wrong i was sad to see the harrier go, but the navy praticly killed it by getting rid of the carriers to use it on. Without the carrier the harriers no where near as good as the tornado and hopefully in a few years, the typhoon.
Click to expand...
The Navy didn't kill the harrier or get rid of the carriers! The Tories canned the Harrier then came to the conclusion that the carriers were now useless without a fixed wing component so they canned the Ark Royal and Invincible and the Illustrious is being converted into a Helo carrier. Besides that the scrapping of the Sea Harrier and the resulting crab infestation practically killed the carriers as an effective force years ago.
 
oh if i recall some of the Harriers are still fired up daily inside their hangar, most are servicable still also, 60 of them are describes as in Pristine condition... and HMS Illustrious is being refitted as a helicopter carrier - but should the harrier call be revoked (i won't get into politics as i'd be banned in a heartbeat) she could be ready to operate Harriers again by Christmas..


back to Voyager, plans are to do her first fuelling of an RAF aircraft under test conditions by mid this year...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top