There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.
If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.
Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.
The Staff of SOH
I still find it extremely disappointing that in our society here, people have a mindset that soccer is for talentless fairies.... What these people don't know, is that it is a sport that desires speed, agility, strength, & intelligence.... there are no timeouts, no offensive coordinator to tell you the play... you make the play....
That may be true in the US but it stands alone in the world in terms of soccer culture. Soccer IS big business in 99% of the world.What soccer doesn't have is the media-fueled economic power of football or basketball (basketball is especially profitable) nor does it have the cultural cachet of baseball, but that doesn't mean I can't enjoy it.
It is truly the beautiful game, and sometimes I truly wish it was the big sport here.....
-witt
Oh you bet, I think the women are better as a team than the men, much better at ball play and playing to the goal rather than taking the long shots. Refereeing has been terrible, just as in the men's Cup.
Witt, I was out of my mind when Abbey scored on that header! After the PKs, I needed a drink!
Stiz, rugby is a game for brutes also, I would be killed playing that game.
Euroraptor, I was a kicker in my HS football, place kicker than is, not punter. I too am a hobbit, but so were most players in my day, the brutes took over the American game 20 years after I hung up my spikes. Anyhow, I tried a walk-on for my university football team and just lost to a soccer-style (I kicked toe-on like Lou Groza, my hero) kicker from England. However, I was approached after my try out by the university soccer coach, who must have liked what he saw (I was also very fast in running) and he approached me to play soccer. I had never seen soccer in my life, much less played it! I went out and within one month, I was so into the game, I played four years! The only sport that I excelled in better than soccer has been cycling, which I still do. But I love the game, many Americans do not enjoy the low score and frustrations that come with soccer, but they are learning after so many of their Hobbit kids take up the game because they cannot play American football with the brutes either. Soccer use to be a clean sport, as did cycling, by that I mean no tattoos and little piercings. But I see that has changed today, more cycle and soccer stars are marred with arm and leg tattoos and ear piercings. That is an anathema to me. Why junk your body up with tactless emblems and look like some criminal? It is my age I am sure, but I just do not understand why decent looking men and women use their body for worthless craft they will have to expose for the rest of their life. I do have tattoos, but they are most often called scars. They are a chronology of every accident that ever happened to me in bike racing.
Caz
I was speaking of the US sports market in my last post. I should have made that more clear. As to the 99% figure, IMO, it's common (that is, not scientific usage) comes from the rather free use of statistical claims from media, especially advertising. I don't know how it is now, but when I was learning research methods, the 99% and 95% confidence intervals were the most common when used as part of a study using analysis of variance. People tend to think a 99% confidence interval means greater certitude, as though it were a 99% probability, when it fact all it may mean is that the researcher is using a wider distribution of events so that the event he's looking for has a greater chance of appearing within that distribution. I personally think (remember, this is just an opinion) people hear the figure so much in advertising and on procedural dramas, they reflexively apply it to whatever they themselves believe to be true. I try not to, but I still catch myself doing it all the time. You want someone to get really mad at you? When you hear this number, ask them where they got it.
JAMES
And always remember that 83% of statistics are made up on the spot. It's likely more than 90%, but likely means anywhere from 60% to 90%, so that opens it up to from 49% to 100%. Or something like that.
Brian
And always remember that 83% of statistics are made up on the spot. It's likely more than 90%, but likely means anywhere from 60% to 90%, so that opens it up to from 49% to 100%. Or something like that.
Brian