• There seems to be an uptick in Political comments in recent months. Those of us who are long time members of the site know that Political and Religious content has been banned for years. Nothing has changed. Please leave all political and religious comments out of the forums.

    If you recently joined the forums you were not presented with this restriction in the terms of service. This was due to a conversion error when we went from vBulletin to Xenforo. We have updated our terms of service to reflect these corrections.

    Please note any post refering to a politician will be considered political even if it is intended to be humor. Our experience is these topics have a way of dividing the forums and causing deep resentment among members. It is a poison to the community. We appreciate compliance with the rules.

    The Staff of SOH

  • Please see the most recent updates in the "Where did the .com name go?" thread. Posts number 16 and 17.

    Post 16 Update

    Post 17 Warning

FSX F-111 Aardwark

Look's nice but it raises a question in my head that I've had for a while. Where and how the heck does the military's aircraft designations come from? It looks like this could just as easily been a "B" instead of an "F". And how did we get from here to the F-14, F-15, etc.? Where's the F-113, the F-1, the F-2...etc. And what happened to the "P"s? We no longer persue enemy aircraft?

I'm just asking. :icon_lol:

LouP
 
LouP said:
Look's nice but it raises a question in my head that I've had for a while. Where and how the heck does the military's aircraft designations come from? It looks like this could just as easily been a "B" instead of an "F". And how did we get from here to the F-14, F-15, etc.? Where's the F-113, the F-1, the F-2...etc. And what happened to the "P"s? We no longer persue enemy aircraft?

I'm just asking. :icon_lol:

LouP
Click to expand...

The F-111 was one of the last of the "Century Series" fighters. I was originally supposed to be a multipurpose all in one fight-bomber. There was a FB-111 version flown by SAC.
 
LouP said:
Look's nice but it raises a question in my head that I've had for a while. Where and how the heck does the military's aircraft designations come from? It looks like this could just as easily been a "B" instead of an "F". And how did we get from here to the F-14, F-15, etc.? Where's the F-113, the F-1, the F-2...etc. And what happened to the "P"s? We no longer persue enemy aircraft?

I'm just asking. :icon_lol:

LouP
Click to expand...

They decided to stop going up in number and start over again and to amalgamate the Air Force, Navy and Marine designations. The F-110 Spectre was the original name of the USAF variant of the Phantom II. It obviously became the F-4 with the new designations.

As for the F-113, that was the designation given to the some of the Russian aircraft tested by the Red Hat squadron, but as YF-113 (Y stands for Prototype in normal deisgnation parlance). Those numbers were also used for classified aircraft. The YF-117A was the Nighthawk, The Tacit Blue was the YF-117D. The MiG-21 was the YF-110.


You can check out the designation change here, U.S. Tri-Service Designation 1962.

You can check out the "secret" designation numbers here, Cover Designations.
 
Sundog said:
They decided to stop going up in number and start over again and to amalgamate the Air Force, Navy and Marine designations. The F-110 Spectre was the original name of the USAF variant of the Phantom II. It obviously became the F-4 with the new designations.

As for the F-113, that was the designation given to the some of the Russian aircraft tested by the Red Hat squadron, but as YF-113 (Y stands for Prototype in normal deisgnation parlance). Those numbers were also used for classified aircraft. The YF-117A was the Nighthawk, The Tacit Blue was the YF-117D. The MiG-21 was the YF-110.


You can check out the designation change here, U.S. Tri-Service Designation 1962.

You can check out the "secret" designation numbers here, Cover Designations.
Click to expand...


Thanks, interesting but I think I am more confused now lol :isadizzy:

LouP :mixedsmi:
 
Kiwikat said:
THIS. It looks completely unrealistic and even silly. Please fix that before you think about releasing it. :kilroy:
Click to expand...

I can assure you that if they do not, I can fix it just as I did with Roland's Rafale pack which the effect setup was nearly the same(constant exhaust flame). Yes, very unrealistic!
 
LouP, the aircraft designations were numbers associated with mission design specifications from Dept of Defense. Some designs never actually produced an aircraft so some numbers just didn't see light of day. Then, the DoD one day just reset the counter to "1" and from then on all services share the same numbering.

Govt attempt to save money on ink, just cost effective to type F4 instead of F114.

Jim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top