Something new....

MenendezDiego said:
'It's not the variant I want!'

'You should really do a Z model!'
Click to expand...

Mock all you like. To be consistent, though, I guess someone should have posted something similar in response to this:

MenendezDiego said:
Still no option for GBU-38's or single GBU-12's?

Come on...really?
Click to expand...

Or, maybe we could agree that expressing our views in a polite, civil manner is part of this hobby, and recognize devs may or may not act on those views - according to their own prerogative - and we agree to live by that.

All I intended was to give perspective on what I thought would be a highly-appreciated niche. Nevertheless, I respect KC's decision - having heard it from him is fine by me. When KC posted looking for a RW Sabre pilot in July, I gave him a suggestion and have sincerely wished him well - so I'm not losing sleep over this. If that's somehow fodder for your amusement, that's fine by me.

dl
 
Guys. Please. The main and most important reason for not doing the D or the H or the L is that they were considerably more complex in terms of radar, weapons, systems and avionics as well as being quite different physically inside and out. We at Milviz, do ONE variant only with maybe some extras in the VC if we can. We do that so that we can put more effort into making sure that it's as right as we can make it. Besides, after the Eagle E debacle, we were looking for something simple but cool. So we decided on that. Please be patient and you will see why.

Thanks for the compliments and the "votes" but seriously, I do not wish this thread to be closed. If you don't like the plane we chose or wish we would/could do something else, this isn't the way to convince us. Emailing me and begging (or sending money) is a good start:jump:. Posting in our forums is a good idea too... but not in a thread where we are showing off what we ARE doing...

This is just my two cents here but I believe it's valid.
 
I am glad to see the F being done "properly". I just hope you make the paint kit as friendly as possible... :wavey:
 
We do try very hard to make the paint kit user friendly but, that said, our goal is always to maximize the amount of quality vs FPS.
 
krazycolin said:
Guys. Please. The main and most important reason for not doing the D or the H or the L is that they were considerably more complex in terms of radar, weapons, systems and avionics as well as being quite different physically inside and out. We at Milviz, do ONE variant only with maybe some extras in the VC if we can. We do that so that we can put more effort into making sure that it's as right as we can make it. Besides, after the Eagle E debacle, we were looking for something simple but cool. So we decided on that. Please be patient and you will see why.

Thanks for the compliments and the "votes" but seriously, I do not wish this thread to be closed. If you don't like the plane we chose or wish we would/could do something else, this isn't the way to convince us. Emailing me and begging (or sending money) is a good start:jump:. Posting in our forums is a good idea too... but not in a thread where we are showing off what we ARE doing...

This is just my two cents here but I believe it's valid.
Click to expand...

Well said! Anyway, if there were a vote it would be the -F for me anyway.
 
Radar equipped 'big sabres' would have been firsts in the FSX world. An F is not.
Please do the long wing slatted late model at least. Martin Baker MK 5 seats were fitted in these by the RNoAF and Luftwaffe around 1959-60.
I see the commercial aspect of this and the way MilViz thinks so I do not have particulary high hopes...
 
May I point out that the F-Block-30 is equipped IRL with gunsight radar.....Sorry for not being around much guys havent had much internet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top